Introduction
For those who have been diligently following what has been published on this blog, you will have noticed the word ‘EUGENICS’ popping up, or ‘EUGENICIST’ in the Bill Gates context.
I’m not decrying anyone’s knowledge, but from conversations with others, it would appear that many don’t actually realise what eugenics means. Or, they can’t make the connection between eugenics and the current planned (hoax) pandemic that we are suffering. So time for an explanation – to clear the fog.
Few can put it better into words than James Corbett. This video is from way back (2009). The content however is timeless. Let’s see and hear JC (no not Jesus Christ – just a very astute and intelligent researcher and observer, who just happens to share the same initials!) :
Now Moving On To Our ‘Friend’ Mr. Gates Junior
Bill Gates, through philanthropist projects, has been positioned as a likeable, mild-mannered figure, who expresses his ambition to improve the health of the world through new vaccine development and technological innovation.
Closer investigation reveals the Gates family has documented ties to reinvented eugenics movements of the modern age and the work carried out by their organisation shows ulterior motives contrary to saving lives.
In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.
THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT
In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics’.
Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.
Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding’, including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born.
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.
Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits’, and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.
As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanise what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives”.
Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue.
CULTURAL MARXISM
The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II, rather, they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.
Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.
During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive’, with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.
The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘social’ organisations.
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularisation of birth control, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernisation”.
The basic premise remained the same, however: it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering, than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.
A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture’, and this ‘progression’ continued, the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.
BILL GATES SNR AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.
Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.
Importantly, Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.
The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today become one of the largest organisations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co., BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.
Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.
In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice’, yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise.
Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.
Does this sound like a group that is dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”.
Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.
THE GATES FOUNDATION
William Gates Snr. would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. Gates Foundation in 1994.
The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement, however the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.
Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavours.
The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture.
In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.
Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work”. She has been openly criticised for these moves.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.
The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.
BILL GATES AND VACCINES
Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market’, and then dominating that market.
In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.
He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:
Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:
- Adaptive trial designs.
- Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
- Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
- Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.
The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunisation.
Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.
Gates’ heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.
Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.
COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC?
‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK
The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready’.
In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled, The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.
The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:
“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
However, as we have explored, there is no fundamental evidence to suggest a threat from the Corona Hoax, which has been invented as a means to usher in further mechanisms of control.
Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.
Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.
EVENT 201
On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.
The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:
“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences.
A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201’, would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
The group claims they did not ‘predict’ the coronavirus, despite modelling their pandemic under the same name. However, when examining their documents, striking similarities begin to emerge:
“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modelled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.”
Let’s think: The ‘real’ coronavirus started over a bat in a meat market, transmitted to humans and shows mild symptoms. The vaccine is also 12-18 months away from being developed.
Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research centre in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specialises in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.
The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.
GATES TO THE RESCUE
Bill Gates is now the talk of the town, and in a recent interview, he told The Daily Show that his foundation was funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine ‘candidates’.
He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalise on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already committed $100 million to fighting coronavirus, as part of its broader efforts in international health. The group is also reportedly exploring the idea of supplying at-home testing kits for the coronavirus.
It also launched a $125 million COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator and gave $5 million to help public health agencies in the Seattle area ‘enhance their capacity’ to detect the virus.
So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.
Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.
THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’
Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, took to Reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.
Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe”. Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.
Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events:
World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.
Furthermore, Gates called for a
national tracking system similar to South Korea”, saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system
He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.
In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.
Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?
Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.
Such is the story of the Dehumanization of Humanity. The ‘death of god’ lead to parasites believing they were gods, and this premise serves as the underlying force driving the transhumanist era.
Using objectivist logic, we must all exercise the precautionary principle when approaching Gates’ claims to ‘improve’ health through vaccines.
If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.
Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and after being labelled as a ‘health threat’. Take the jab or be targeted.
I know where I stand.
Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?
National governments around the world have responded to the coronavirus situation with similar programmes for action due to the single global source of guidance / information; this being the WHO. On-line guidance, available in multiple languages, and media reports all emanate from that single global source. This suggests that the actions of national governments are directed by unelected technocrats who have the power to inflict significant economic damage on democratically elected governments leading to economic recession / depression in pursuit of their goal of implementing a global vaccination programme. The economic lock-down policy is not endorsed by certain eminent members of the medical profession [including Dr Judy Mikovits and Professor Dolores Cahill] whose views are not reported in the Mainstream Media [MSM]. 
The global cabal, referred to above, operate throughout the world through a subsidiary network of contacts and are in a position to advise national governments, hence the synchronised approach to the response to this situation. The process was initiated in China and then progressed to Europe, Middle East and America. The brutal lock-down in China was used as a template by WHO and replicated in other countries around the world. I take the view that national governments will, as time progresses, be informed by WHO that life can only return to normal when a global vaccination programme is in place. Those that decline to be vaccinated are likely in my view to be denied privileges: for example, they may not be allowed to travel abroad or may be required to quarantine on arrival abroad. Unvaccinated children may not be allowed to attend school i.e. they may need to self-isolate from society as they will be considered to be a risk to the vaccinated population. That argument is illogical. The major pharmaceutical companies, part owned by the BMGF as major shareholder, will develop and deliver the vaccine. This is driven by a global process outside the control of national governments and coordinated by WHO. 
The degree of panic generated by the MSM, controlled by the global cabal, has resulted in people experiencing other potentially life-threatening medical conditions [including cancer, strokes and heart disease] staying away from hospitals or having their diagnosis and treatments postponed. I would argue there is no justification for pausing diagnosis and treatment of cancer and thus creating a spike in future death rate, simply to deal with a coronavirus. The government acknowledges that most of the population will experience mild or no symptoms and even those more seriously affected are likely to make a full recovery. The UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, is a case in point. Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer is of paramount importance and, as many hospitals now have spare capacity, it remains unclear why diagnosis and treatment of cancer, and other life threatening conditions, remains suspended based on advice received from unelected technocrats in a corrupt global organisation now under investigation. 
Have received funding in the sum of £79 Million from the BMGF. 
The population of the UK has been subjected by the MSM to daily records of death from Covid-19 virus. I believe it is important to note that, throughout history, people of all ages have died for various reasons and will continue to do so. We have been advised that a young person in his early 20s died from Covid-19 giving the impression that all age groups are at risk. It was only weeks later that it was revealed that the person also had undiagnosed leukaemia. Official records will confirm that the comedian Eddie Large died from Covid-19. He was admitted to hospital with heart failure having suffered from heart disease for a number of years. There is evidence to suggest that over 30,000 people in the UK have not died from Covid-19 virus: no specific test has yet been developed. The qRT-PCR test simply confirms whether a trace of coronavirus has been found in the body. This could even be from a previous flu vaccination. A positive PCR test would require healthy people to incorrectly self-isolate. Their contacts are traced and also required to self isolate thus ensuring maximum disruption to the economy. Healthy people quarantined and effectively placed under “house arrest” by the state [on advice from unelected corrupt technocrats] to perpetuate the fear agenda and to generate totally misleading statistics regarding those infected by the Covid-19 strain of coronavirus.
In America, hospitals receive substantial additional funding if they decide to place patients on ventilators or if they are prepared to reclassify patients as dying from Covid-19 rather than other causes [terminal cancer, hart failure etc]. Hospitals, desperate to receive funding to avoid having to lay off nurses and doctors, comply with the instructions, hence the alarming Covid-19 death statistics generated in USA. Patients testing positive for Covid-19 are directed to hospital ICU thus overwhelming that sector of the health service while other hospitals are under capacity. The new Nightingale hospital in London [capacity 4000 patients] was “mothballed” in May 2020 as it is not now required. Those in control will argue that non-use demonstrates that the policy of social distancing and the lock-down of the economy has worked and therefore we need further lock-downs and social isolation when the second and third wave of the “virus” hit us. 
Facebook to censor anyone who publishes anything that remotely resembles the truth, and goes against the official line, then you should start to get the picture. Coincidence? Coincidence is the lazy thinker’s excuse not to do study and research into these things.
.png)
Comments in Posts