The Scandal Of Device Regulation In The UK – Including Approval Of Experimental Vaccines
Before moving on to the subject of regulation of vaccines – more especially in the context of the new, now ‘approved’ mRNA vaccine that is currently being rolled out in the UK, let’s look at how reliable and efficient the MHRA has been in the past, more specifically it’s approval of RT-PCR testing equipment.
It is now scientifically proven without a shadow of a doubt that RT-PCR testing is ABSOLUTELY useless and not designed for use in diagnosing ‘cases’ of Covid-19. It is universally accepted that the false positive results returned, especially when the test process uses over 30 cycles for amplification of segments of any part of the Coronavirus genome (not specifically a supposed ‘new’ strain that causes the the disease labelled Covid-19 – but ANY fragments, including fragments of previous common cold infections or previous flu vaccinations) has a false positive rate of 80%+. The number of cycles originally recommended for the UK is 45 cycles – that can return a false positive test result return of around 98%. However, the policies introduced by the UK government are wholly based on the use of RT-PCR. The mainstream media endorses this scam by perpetually broadcasting an increased ‘case’ figure from these false positive results. The protesting voices of eminent experts in the medical and associated science fields are censored, through media blackout. More tests using RT-PCR obviously returns more false positive results. There is no more that needs to be said, apart from the fact that the remit of MHRA includes the approval of RT-PCR testing equipment.
Track Record of MHRA
Reproduced below is the background information provided by Brian Hall for a petition he presented to parliament, highlighting the problem with MHRA – including their close ties with Big Pharma. We should all by now be aware of the unholy connections between Big Pharma, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the their biggest funders (if the US pulls their funding – as they have said they would, pending an investigation) – the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who pump in around $4.3 Billion into that organisation. Money talks. He who pays the piper calls the tune, and Gates’ ‘tune’ is that he wants ALL of the citizens of the earth vaccinated. He has also spoken publicly in past lectures that he has given, that the world needs to be depopulated (down from the current 7.8 billion to 500,000 (half a billion), and he says openly that depopulation is achievable through vaccination. He, and a long line of his family, are committed eugenicists. From that information alone you should have second thoughts about the gigantic political push that is being implemented to get people vaccinated against Covid-19, despite the fact that it is admitted that it will provide no defence against infection and will not stop the transfer of the virus. Even more worrying is the fact that the approved vaccine by MHRA will use a new mRNA type vaccine:
View Published ARTICLE
So what exactly is it for? More worryingly, it has not been denied by Big Pharma – the vaccine manufacturers – that there is a risk of sterilisation in women vaccinated, and one of the components found in the vaccine is known to disrupt the growth of the placenta in pregnant women.
The mRNA vaccine is not fully tested, and the long term effects are unknown to the public. However the MHRA has given the green light for the vaccine to be used in the UK (the first country in the world to approve it). Given their provable connections with Big Pharma, that is not encouraging news for any individuals that think for themselves.
Excerpt From The Preamble To Brian Hall’s Petition
The MHRA has been proven to be a tool of “Big Pharma”, a puppet of the worlds largest pharmaceutical industries. Far from the task of protecting the public from harmful health care the MHRA is in fact protecting the largest pharmaceutical companies from loss of profits instead. There are many less expensive and effective alternatives for doctors to choose from for maintaining or returning to good health. The MHRA actively prevents access to these, our own choice of medications in favour of harmful often unproven drugs of the profiteering big pharmaceutical companies.
GcMAF
We have heard that months ago on the 28th January 2015 the MHRA ruthlessly terminated the production of GcMAF in England.
GcMAF is a human protein all of us naturally produce, and a human right; it has no side effects. It is the best treatment known for 90% of cancers, and 50 other diseases. People with run down immune systems can’t make it, and need external GcMAF to cure their diseases. It was discovered in 1990, and the MHRA has deliberately concealed this powerful but harmless product from the public since then.
200 scientists have since written over 100 scientific research papers on GcMAF, and Immuno Biotech Ltd have supplied 10,000 people, and achieving fabulous results before the MHRA closed this laboratory down.
As the regulatory agency they should have helped Immuno Biotech Ltd (IBL) to get the product into the NHS as soon as possible. Conversely they abused their position, to protect the profits of the big pharmaceutical companies that they illegally represent.
Rather than taking mature intelligent approach by making a telephone call to arrange a meeting, instead the MHRA raided IBL’s Cambridge laboratory with 8 police officers in attendance, 4 in bullet proof vests, interrogated and terrorised the two female scientists who were on duty for eight hours. They ladies were so badly traumatised by this experience they could not work for months afterwards.
The MHRA closed Immuno Biotech’s bank accounts using the illegal compliance system, and the company was forced to cease trading.
The MHRA somehow closed the CEO’s personal bank accounts and left him penniless. They are now doing the same to other members of his family.
On the MHRA’s website they published 18 fraudulent misrepresentations about IBL’s excellent sterility record.
The MHRA committed perjury and fraudulent misrepresentation in their witness statement to Canterbury Crown court to obtain a restraint order.
By denying the public this one excellent treatment, GcMAF, that saves lives, the MHRA are in fact committing a crime against humanity. 160,000 people a year die unnecessarily in Britain from cancer; most could and should have been saved.
The MHRA, the UK Drug Safety Agency, Falsified Vaccine Safety Data – Millions of Children Put At Serious Risk
GSK’s Cervarix HPV vaccines for cervical cancer: The MHRA systematically tampered with 6000 reports of adverse reactions to declare the vaccine safe…………The MHRA’s Director Gerald Heddell and CEO Ian Hudson are both ex GSK, (Glaxo Smith Kline).
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/new-research-shows-how-gardasil-and-cervarix-vaccines-can-silently-kill-your-daughters-and-sons/
House of Commons Health Select Committee Report of 2005
In view of the failings of the MHRA, we recommend a fundamental review.”
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhealth/42/42.pdf
MHRA: Regulators’ trail of deception has been exposed
Andrew Miller, the chairman of a parliamentary select committee, has said that a “trail of deception” has been exposed in the system.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/9629337/Faulty-medical-implants-investigation-Regulators-trail-of-deception-has-been-exposed-says-chairman.html
MHRA under fire amid calls for shake-up of regulatory system
31-Jan-2012
The scandal of device regulation in the UK
Horton said:
The MHRA’s mission is ‘to enhance and safeguard the health of the public by ensuring that medicines and medical devices work and are acceptably safe’.
The MHRA is, by its own admission, unable to fulfil this mission.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2960070-1/fulltext?rss=yes
MHRA, The Seroxat killer: Parmjit Dhanda, MP, Gloucester
is asking the Government why they allowed Dr Ian Hudson, the MHRA CEO, to take part in the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA)’s review of Seroxat, an antidepressant. As well as working as worldwide safety director for GSK – the manufacturers of Seroxat (Paxil, Paroxetine)– from 1999 until 2001, Dr Hudson acted as witness for the defence in a trial in which Seroxat was accused of triggering a man’s violent and suicidal behaviour.
The late Paul Flynn Newport Gwent MP for 32 years, and a qualified chemist, said:
What credibility does the MHRA have?
Recent events have proven that it is not a watchdog; it is a pussycat that purrs in front of the pharmaceutical industry and does what it is told. It has an incestuous relationship with the big pharmas and has a close association with the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. It has a disgraceful recent record.
We can look with gratitude to the work NOT of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in protecting the public, but to people such as Sarah Boseley of The Guardian for her exposé of the organisation, to the television programme “Panorama” and to Richard Brook of Mind, who courageously resigned from the MHRA in disgust at its activities.
It is a matter of enormous importance that, in recent history, the regulator is not protecting the 25,000 people who suffered heart attacks and the 7,000 who died from taking a painkilling drug for arthritics that was withdrawn by Merck Sharpe and Dohme in September, after being promoted by the regulator.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/mar/13/politics.highereducation
MHRA conceals Seroxat causes suicide
The MHRA had information in its possession for more than a decade that high doses of the anti-depressant Seroxat can lead to aggression and thoughts of suicide. But instead of revealing the truth to the 17,000 people taking high doses and the other half-million Britons on a safer dose, the MHRA sat on its findings. Astonishingly, I was actually threatened with legal action by Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA, if I revealed this.”—RICHARD BROOK
The MHRA is GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis Pasteur, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme
A Sunday Express investigation found that nearly a third of the 181 experts who sit on the Medicines Control Agency (MCA, now the MHRA) committees are linked to Glaxo Smith Kline, Aventis Pasteur or Merck, Sharpe and Dohme……The MCA has continued to endorse the triple measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) jab despite concerns linking it to autism and stomach disorders. But the extent of the MCA members’ financial ties to MMR manufacturers raises questions about potential conflicts of interest.”–Sunday Express
Licensed drugs are the number 4 killer of mankind
The MHRA’s big brother, the USA’s FDA, admits drugs, ie those the FDA and MHRA license, kill scores of thousands. That’s what happens when the regulator is controlled by the drug companies. The MHRA conceal this.
The MHRA is criticised for failing to adequately regulate implants
with grim consequences for some patients. While the board contains retired senior executives from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme, it includes no one from a patient group, or any other body representing people whose health could be damaged by its decisions.
The web of unelected bodies functions as a kind of shadow government, drafting and enforcing policies, disbursing money, regulating – or failing to regulate – business, quietly, unobtrusively, without effective public scrutiny or restraint. When it is unbalanced, crawling with conflicts of interest, it makes a nonsense of democracy.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/12/nhs-health
The MHRA protects the monopolies of the billion dollar pharmaceuticals (who charge, eg. £40,000 for a round of chemotherapy), and ruthlessly closes down inexpensive, effective treatments wherever it can.
Even the courts know the MHRA is corrupt
The MHRA has never successfully prosecuted a company since it was established nearly 10 years ago. (It seems judges won’t accept evidence from so corrupt a source.)
BGB Comment:
Given the above information, do you trust the MHRA with the responsibility of regulating the miraculous ‘new’ vaccine that is being rolled out?
THINK!
- The whole Covid-19 so called ‘pandemic’ scare was orchestrated by the World Health Organisation (WHO)
- Most governments globally took the advice of the WHO
- Advisors to governments have links to the WHO but more revealing is their connections with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- Government advisors the world over (the technocrats) have dictated government policies in the wake of the fake pandemic scare.
- Nearly all advisors either have direct, or indirect connections to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. If not funded directly (another name for that is corruption and vested interests), then the establishments they represent (e.g. Neil Ferguson’s Imperial College London – over $280 million in funding received – that we know about, suck on the teat of the breast of Gates’ foundation.
- Advisors have DIRECT connections with Big Pharma. Many hold shares in these companies or are past high ranking executive members on the boards of those companies.
- MHRA is the vassal of Big Pharma, is tasked with regulating the products of the companies they are in bed with.
- The new miraculous mRNA vaccine has been passed as safe and endorsed in the UK by MHRA.
- Big Pharma has managed through aggressive lobbying, to get governments to indemnify them from any responsibility in the event of claims being made for death, side effects or damage caused by the vaccine (that’s a confidence booster for a supposedly ‘safe’ vaccine).
SEE ALSO The Billy & BoJo Double Act:
View Previous ARTICLE
Now, will you obediently roll up your sleeve to be a guinea pig for the vaccine in your country? Time to re-engage the brain, cast off the propaganda and start using a bit of old fashioned common sense logic.
If you STILL think you can trust the MHRA and all the corrupt connections they have, it’s a sad fact that you may be deserving of anything that may befall you as a consequence.
SUBSCRIBE for FREE to receive notifications of new posts in your e-mail inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Comments in Posts