WHO:   World Health Organisation

BMGF:   Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

PREP:   Act Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness [PREP] Act

SEIRUS:  Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Removed-Undetectable-Susceptible [mathematical computer model]

PCR:   (test) SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR kit

MSM:   Mainstream Media: representing government and corporate interests

AM:   Alternative Media: advocate the interests of those excluded from the mainstream

NIAID:   National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

ONS:   Office for National Statistics

COBR:   Cabinet Office Briefing Room

SAGE:   Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies

  1. Global [not national] control is now exercised in accordance with United Nations Agenda 2030: this being an agenda to transform the world through a plan of action to deliver sustainable development [economic, social and environmental] with all countries acting in collaborative partnerships to implement 17 sustainable development goals and 169 targets over a 15 year period ending 2030. Governments and public institutions work closely on implementation with regional and local authorities, sub-regional institutions, international institutions, academia, philanthropic organisations, volunteer groups and others.

  1. Control is now exercised by the “deep state“, this being networks of power operating independently of a state’s political leadership in pursuit of their own agenda and goals and in opposition to the agenda of elected officials. Control that is in the hands of a tiny few extremely powerful, extremely rich and influential cabal; contrary to the impression given that control rests with individual states. They operate throughout the world through a subsidiary network of contacts.

  1. The Covid-19 crisis has highlighted the loss of UK national democratic control and accountability as health care policy and process is driven by unelected technocrats at a single global source: the WHO.

  1. World health services are currently monopolised by the BMGF with global vaccination programmes high on the agenda. This will generate massive profits for major pharmaceutical companies. BMGF is a major shareholder and therefore has considerable influence and control. Funding from BMGF is distributed as listed hereunder and illustrated on chart below, presented as Annex 01:

    1. WHO – 4.3 billion

    2. GAVI [The Vaccine Alliance] – 3 billion

    3. John Hopkins University – 870 million

    4. Imperial College London – 280 million

    5. University of Oxford – 243 million

    6. England’s Chief Medical Officer [various departments] – 40 million

    7. BBC Media Action – 53 million

    8. Centre for Disease Control US – 155 million

    9. NIAID – 18 million

  1. The Covid-19 crisis is coordinated and directed globally by WHO, funded by BMGF.

  1. The China economic lock-down model was used as a template with the action replicated in other countries under direction from WHO. The brutal lock-down in China was easily implemented given the level of control exercised by the state. What is surprising is the ease with which the economies of western democracies UK, USA and European countries were also locked down [using the China model as a template] with emergency powers to curb individual freedoms introduced at short notice circumventing proper scrutiny by elected representatives of the people. This again suggests global control of the health care and economic programmes of national governments.

  1. The PCR test for Covid-19 is 80% inaccurate and should only be used for research purpose and not for clinical diagnosis as confirmed by the test manufacturer. No specific test for the Covid-19 strain of corona-virus has been developed as the virus has not, to date, been isolated in a laboratory. The PCR test does not conform to the gold standard [Koch’s Postulates] for identifying a virus. Supporting evidence is presented in Annex 02 below. The PCR test takes a sample of human cells and amplifies any DNA to look for “viral sequences” i.e. minute traces of non-human DNA that match parts of a known viral genome. The genome of an organism is the whole of its hereditary information encoded in its DNA [or, for some viruses, RNA]. It uses “amplification” which means taking a minute amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is virtually impossible, even ignoring the other important issue: “viral load“. As the PCR test amplifies minute amounts of DNA it cannot assess viral load which is the important question when it comes to diagnosing illness. For a virus to cause illness a massive amount needs to be present in the body. As PCR does not test viral load it cannot determine if a virus is present in sufficient quantity to cause illness. Coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have coronavirus DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen. It is this that the PCR test detects. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means [flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything] will have a positive PCR test for coronavirus even if the tests are conducted properly and ruling out contamination, simply because coronavirus are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. Based on the above the following sets out the likely sequence of events and actions by the “deep state” to create the illusion of a global pandemic.

    1. Select the sickest patients in a single location e.g. Wuhan China.

    2. Administer PCR test to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus [likely to be large number] is suffering from a “new” disease.

    3. As the sickest flu or pneumonia cases were identified at a single location a high proportion are likely to die.

    4. Assert that the “new” virus has a CFR [Case Fatality Rate] higher than the Flu and use this to infuse more concern and conduct more tests which will produce more “cases” which expands the testing, which produces yet more “cases” etc. etc. The illusion of a dangerous new pathogen has been achieved simply by using the PCR test to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

    5. Run the same sequence of events in other countries [using China as template] making sure to keep the fear message running high so that panic is generated to enable the population to be easily controlled under emergency powers.

    6. Issue two new international ICD-10 codes to countries around the world to enable death from Covid-19 to be recorded based either on:

      1. a positive PCR test [which is 80% inaccurate] using code U07.1, or

      2. no PCR test using code U07.2, thus enabling death from other causes to be reclassified as Covid-19 deaths to dramatically affect mortality statistics.

    7. Forewarn the public that more deaths are imminent and use this as an excuse to quarantine the healthy population in their homes under emergency powers.

    8. Respond to scrutiny / criticism from the public regarding low global mortality rates [0.25 million compared with 1.5 million in 2017 flu epidemic] by arguing that the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

    9. Introduce a testing process to test healthy people [who will have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them] and thus inflate “case” figures with “asymptomatic carriers” keeping the fear message running high. It should be noted that virologists will confirm the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen. In conclusion, it is not possible to “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.

  1. Total global death rate has remained virtually the same throughout this period when compared to the statistics for past deaths during a similar period. Covid-19 does not have a high mortality rate when compared with seasonal flu. Covid-19 recorded deaths globally amount to approximately 0.25 million. This compares with 1.5 million deaths globally in the 2017 flu epidemic. More people are dying because of state-imposed corona-measures than are being killed by the virus as a corona-focussed healthcare system is postponing life-saving surgery and delaying or reducing treatment for non-corona patients, including cancer patients.

  1. It is important to note that an immune response is triggered when a coronavirus enters the patients’ lungs. In some patients the immune system overreacts generating a “cytokine storm” which can seriously harm or even kill the patient.

  1. Multiple corona viruses are circulating: the common cold and seasonal flu being two examples. In mortality statistics there is a need therefore to differentiate between “death from Covid-19” and “death with a corona-virus“. Government ministers and the MSM do not appear to understand the important difference when presenting daily briefings.

  1. Covid-19 mortality data / statistics can be exaggerated following instruction from WHO that two international emergency codes can be used for record purpose on death certificates, code U07.1 [following a positive PCR test result with results being 80% inaccurate], and code U07.2 [without PCR test]. The relevant abstract from WHO website is reproduced below as supporting evidence in Annex 03. Through this coding process those dying from other causes can be reclassified as Covid-19 deaths thus dramatically affecting mortality statistics which, in turn, drive national government policy and process on health care and economics, with important decisions taken on a weekly basis by government ministers affecting the livelihoods of millions of people during the lock-down period.

  1. Concerns have been raised by the ONS regarding the quality of data and the statistics generated from the data. These are presented in daily briefings by government ministers and their scientific advisors, and promulgated by the MSM. Specific concerns have been raised by the ONS regarding the quality of data and statistics with regard to the “test, track and trace” programme. Public confidence in the testing and death recording statistics generated is therefore of paramount importance. Correspondence is continuing with the ONS to establish whether they have confidence in the data gathering process and the resulting statistics placed in the public domain.

  1. The SEIRUS mathematical computer model is used to estimate re-infection [R – number] rate. It is not certified by peer review and should not be relied on to guide clinical practice and should not be reported in news media as established fact, as confirmed by model designer. Supporting evidence is presented in Annex 04 below.

  1. There is mounting evidence that this is a “plandemic” not a “pandemic” with the plan now in the implementation phase. The economic lock-down is being implemented to weaken and destroy economies. The cost to UK Treasury of economic lock-down to date is estimated to be in the region of £133 billion. The “deep state” [cabal] now executing this plan have predicted a second and subsequent waves. They have the power to create economic recession / depression in order to achieve one of their objectives: a global vaccination programme that will generate vast wealth for the big pharmaceutical companies: a trillion dollar industry. It concentrates wealth and power in the 0.1% with the remaining 99.9% of the population left poorer and dependent on the state for their survival, and consequently more easily controlled under emergency powers following loss of freedoms.

  1. The economic lock-down model has now been tested in UK and other countries. The model is in place with emergency powers on the statute book for use when those now implementing this plan decide to initiate the second wave of fear. The timing is outside the control of national governments and elected representatives of the people: the process is coordinated and directed from a single global source: the WHO funded by the BMGF. Global administration as outlined in “United Nations Agenda 2030” [previously known as Agenda 2021].

  1. The flawed computer model developed by Professor Neil Ferguson at Imperial College London [ICL] was used to justify economic lock-down in UK and USA with a policy of social distancing. Funding of 280 million has been provided to ICL by the BMGF. Those now examining the model design in detail have found significant flaws and yet the model predictions continue to drive government policy and process and reports in the MSM. The Imperial College code provides different answers using the same inputs. In particular, the same assumptions can provide results that differ by 80,000 deaths over a span of 80 days. There are apparently myriad other problems as well including undocumented codes and numerous bugs. This is not the first time bad computer models have been used to drive government policy and process. Statistical models can be useful tools for guiding policy, but they are only as credible as the assumptions on which they are based. It is fundamentally important for models used in policy to be made publicly available, have assumptions clearly stated, and have their robustness to changes to these assumptions tested. Models also need to be updated as time goes on in line with the best available evidence. The Imperial College model didn’t meet any of these criteria. And, sadly, the model was relied on as the basis for locking down two countries UK and USA.

  1. Restrictions to human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to data protection, under current emergency powers should be limited in time.

  1. The rapid roll-out of 5-G technology during economic lock-down period is a matter of grave concern as no protests are possible during the lock-down period. Currently, no peer-reviewed, empirical studies of the biologic or health effects from exposure to 5-G radiation have been published.

  1. The views on Covid-19 crisis and the medical countermeasures required to manage the situation and to mitigate loss of life, presented by eminent members of the medical profession [including Dr Andrew Kaufman Dr Rashid Buttar Professor Dolores Cahill Professor Knut Wittkowski Dr Judy Mikovits Dr Shiva Ayyadurai] are censored by the MSM and ignored by government ministers.

  1. It should be noted there are documented links between BMGF and WHO and those who are advising governments. They have connections with big pharmaceutical companies who stand to make vast profits from a global vaccination programme.

  1. Any vaccine developed will be the first of its kind to use DNA / RNA. Vaccines may be compulsory and may be delivered without the consent of the individual.

  1. A vaccine may be delivered by means of a process known as “electroporation”. This renders cell membranes transiently permeable to allow genetic modification. Three needles are used in conjunction; two to deliver an electrical charge that makes cells “porous”, the third needle delivers DNA [from a variety of sources both human and animal based]. The electrical current allows the DNA to be introduced and to enter human cells. The long term effects are not known. Permanent modification of a parent DNA may adversely impact any offspring. No studies have been undertaken.

  1. It should be noted that in the USA, effective from 4 February 2020, a declaration pursuant to section 319 F-3 of the PREP Act provides liability indemnity for activities related to medical countermeasures against Covd-19 e.g. vaccination programmes. Additional information is provided in Annex 05 below.

  1. SAGE is responsible for ensuring that timely and coordinated scientific advice is made available to decision makers to support UK cross-government decisions in the COBR. The advice provided by SAGE does not represent official government policy and is not therefore legally binding.

  2. The plan has always been to centralise power in every area of life, because the more you centralise decision making the fewer people can dictate to the rest. The goal is to impose the will of the world government; a world centralised bank to control global finance; a world currency that would be electronic, not cash; and a micro-chipped population linked to a global computer. The network is structured like Russian dolls, or pyramids, the smaller ones inside bigger ones. The secret societies are divided into levels or “degrees” and each higher degree knows more than the one below. You only progress to a higher level when you are chosen to do so, and the knowledge is strictly compartmentalised and restricted. They own, or control, all forms of mass communication to ensure that news and information would portray the world as the cabal wanted the people to see it. The Orwellian global state is being manipulated into place through the Cabal’s secret society network, which ensures that its operatives, or stooges, are appointed to the positions of power and influence. These are not just politicians, but crucially their “advisors” and administrators, and those who control banking, business, military and media. Their actions are coordinated through the Cabal’s web and the centrally-dictated decisions of the hidden elite are implemented across the world by their agents in government and commerce. The compartmentalisation means that the most secret society members know little, or mostly nothing, of the bigger agenda [a global fascist nightmare] and nor would they support it if they did. A powerful and dangerous secret cult patronised and protected by the highest level government officials in the world. Its membership is composed of those in the power centres of government, industry, commerce, finance, and labor. It manipulates individuals in areas of important public influence, including the academic world and the mass media. The secret cult is a global fraternity of a political aristocracy whose purpose is to further the political policies of persons or agencies unknown. It acts covertly and illegally. Every country has its own secret society network and this connects with the global web.


Annex 01

Funding provided by BMGF

Annex 02

PCR test

Annex 03

Abstract from WHO website

International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems ICD revision 10

Emergency use ICD codes for COVID-19 disease outbreak

The COVID-19 disease outbreak has been declared a public health emergency of international concern.

An emergency ICD-10 code of ‘U07.1 COVID-19, virus identified’ is assigned to a disease diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by laboratory testing.

  • An emergency ICD-10 code of ‘U07.2 COVID-19, virus not identified’ is assigned to a clinical or epidemiological diagnosis of COVID-19 where laboratory confirmation is inconclusive or not available.
  • Both U07.1 and U07.2 may be used for mortality coding as cause of death. See the International guidelines for certification and classification (coding) of COVID-19 as cause of death following the link below.
  • In ICD-11, the code for the confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 is RA01.0 and the code for the clinical diagnosis (suspected or probable) of COVID-19 is RA01.1.

Annex 04

SEIRUS mathematical computer model

Annex 05

Immunity from Liability under PREP Act


No account yet? Register