NOTES and UPDATES
[last updated 24 May 2020 – W. Jones]
Control of health programmes
Global control and manipulation of governments’ heath programmes emanates from a single source. Control that is in the hands of a tiny few extremely powerful, extremely rich and influential Cabal; contrary to the impression given that control rests with individual states. World health services now monopolised by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [B&MGF] with future global vaccination programmes high on the agenda. This will generate massive profits for major pharmaceutical companies. Bill Gates is a major shareholder and therefore has considerable influence and control.
Global control and coordination
National governments have responded with similar programmes for action due to the single global source of guidance / information; this being the WHO, funded by the B&MGF. On-line guidance, available in multiple languages, and media reports all emanate from that single global source. This suggests that the actions of national governments are directed by unelected technocrats who have the power to inflict significant economic damage leading to recession in pursuit of their goal of implementing a global vaccination programme. The economic lock-down policy is not endorsed by certain eminent members of the medical profession [including Dr Judy Mikovits and Professor Dolores Cahill] whose views are not reported in MSM.
This global pandemic is driven by eugenics agenda: improving the genetic composition of the human race. The global pandemic is coordinated by World Health Organisation [WHO] who advise national governments and funded by the B&MGF [his views on the subject of eugenics is on record]. Funding to WHO by USA is being withheld pending the outcome of an investigation.
Operate throughout the world through a subsidiary network of contacts and are in a position to advise national governments, hence the synchronised approach to the response to this alleged pandemic that was initiated in China and then progressed to Europe, Middle East and America. The brutal lock-down in China was used as a template by WHO and replicated in other countries around the world thus creating the illusion of a global pandemic. National governments will, in due course, be informed by WHO that life can only return to normal when a global vaccination programme is in place. Those that refuse to be vaccinated are likely to be denied privileges: for example, they may not be allowed to travel abroad and unvaccinated children may not be allowed to attend school i.e. they may need to self-isolate from society as they are considered to be a risk to the vaccinated population. The major pharmaceutical companies, part owned by Bill Gates as a major shareholder, will develop and deliver the vaccine. This is driven by a global process outside the control of national governments and coordinated by WHO.
Democratic control and accountability.
Constant repetition by political leaders in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland of the following statement. “Our decisions on lock-down of the economy will be based on medical and scientific advice“. That advice is provided to national governments by WHO. It suggests that decisions on the lock-down of economies in democratic countries is being driven by unelected technocrats. The decision, in April 2020, by USA to withhold funding to WHO pending the outcome of an investigation suggests serious concerns have been identified. The B&MGF remains a major funder of WHO and a shareholder in major pharmaceutical companies who will develop and deliver a global vaccination programme.
A specific test for Covid-19 has not been developed. It has not been identified or isolated to prove that a virus exists. The test conducted is the quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, or qRT-PCR. It does not detect antigen but viral RNA. The method used does not conform to the gold standard for identifying a virus, which is called Koch’s postulates. The way the test is conducted is by amplifying the RNA collected from lung fluid or a swab. The mixture is filtered and amplified. What is looked for is the Ribonucleic acid (RNA) – a polymeric molecule essential in various biological roles in coding. If RNA from a corona-virus is detected, the test is considered a positive for Covid-19. There are many thousands of corona-viruses of which Covid-19 is a strain. Large sections of the population have been exposed to some corona-virus in their lives: the common cold is a strain of corona-virus as is the seasonal flu.
Covid-19 test kit.
Manufacturer of “SARS-CoV-2 Corona-virus Multiplex RT-qPCR kit” has advised that it should only be used for research purposes and not for diagnostic applications as it has not yet been clinically validated.
SEIRUS Computer Model
A mathematical computer model, developed by Nasarawa State University Keffi Nigeria, to estimate the probability of re-infection with Covid-19 coronavirus. The preprint posted 6 April 2020 is not certified by peer review and its validity may therefore be subsequently challenged. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that has not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health related behaviour and should not be reported in news media as established information, as clearly indicated in these documents:
The model is based on the results of the “quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction” test [qRT-PCR]. The test method used does not conform to the gold standard for identifying a virus, which is called Koch’s postulates. It should be noted that no test has been developed, to date, specifically for the Covid-19 strain of coronavirus. Further clarification is required regarding reference to quarantine in the model: is this a reference to quarantine of the healthy population through economic lock-down, or quarantine of the section of population infected by Covid-19 virus, or quarantine of the section of the population who have tested positive for coronavirus using qRT-PCR test. Model assumptions should be examined carefully in view of the reference to “infected individuals being quarantined“. It remains unclear how death is recorded for input to the model: death from Covid-19 virus or death with Covid-19 virus. A complaint was submitted to BBC 17 May 2020 regarding their constant reference in news bulletins to this computer model without acknowledging that it had not been certified by peer review. The complaint was acknowledged 17 May 2020 under reference CAS-6066673-V3Q4M0 Awaiting formal reply.
BBC Complaints - Updated_Case numberCAS-6066673-V3Q4M0
Immune response to corona based viruses
Diseases such as the unidentified, and as yet un-isolated, covid-19 and other corona based viruses like influenza can be fatal due to an overreaction of the body’s immune system called a cytokine storm. Cytokines are small proteins released by many different cells in the body, including those of the immune system, where they coordinate the body’s response against infection and trigger inflammation. Sometimes the body’s response to infection can go into overdrive. For example, when SARS -CoV-2 – the virus behind the covid-19 pandemic – enters the lungs, it triggers an immune response, attracting immune cells to the region to attack the virus, resulting in localised inflammation. But in some patients, excessive or uncontrolled levels of cytokines are released which then activate more immune cells, resulting in hyper-inflammation. This can seriously harm or even kill the patient.
The total global death rate has remained virtually the same as normal throughout this period, when compared to the statistics for past deaths during a similar period. In the UK the total death rate is slightly lower than the average, in the rest of Europe it is virtually the same. So a directive was issued to apply corona-virus to death certificates of everyone who has tested positive for corona-virus. The annual death rate, from all causes, remains static. Indeed there are spikes in previous years caused by particularly virulent flu outbreaks. 2017 being a good example. There is a need to differentiate between death with corona-virus and death from corona-virus to avoid totally misleading death statistics being generated.
In USA, hospitals receive substantial additional funding if they decide to place patients on ventilators or if they are prepared to reclassify patients as dying from Covid-19 rather than other causes [terminal cancer, hart failure etc]. Hospitals, desperate to receive funding to avoid having to lay off nurses and doctors, comply with the instructions, hence the alarming Covid-19 death statistics generated in USA. Patients testing positive for Covid-19 are directed to hospital ICU thus overwhelming that sector of the health service while other hospitals are under capacity. The new Nightingale hospital in London [capacity 4000 patients] was “mothballed” in May 2020 as it is not now required. Those in control will argue that non-use demonstrates that the policy of social distancing and the lock-down of the economy has worked and therefore we need further lock-downs and social isolation when the second and third wave of the “virus” hit us.
Restrictions to human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to data protection, under current emergency powers should be limited in time. If they involve personal data processing, the basic principles of Convention 108 Council of Europe Treaty should be respected, and the rights of data subjects guaranteed. There is a need for scrutiny with regard to “track and trace” phone apps now being tested, and rolled out for wider use, to ensure personal data is anonymised.
There has been a rapid roll-out of 5-G technology during Covid-19 lock-down period. No protests are possible due to restrictions on social gatherings. 5-G technology poses potential hazards for human health and the environment. The technology has not been investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5-G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. 5-G signals have higher frequency and shorter wavelengths, which mean the distance between the device and the “tower”, must be shorter.
Professor Neil Ferguson.
An epidemiologist of Imperial College London [part funded by the B&MGF], using his computer model, predicted huge casualties for the population of UK and USA unless they enacted severe curbs on individual freedoms to lock the nations down. The advice was heeded by UK government in March 2020 and lock-down implemented. On 5 May 2020 Professor Ferguson resigned from SAGE [the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies] when media reports revealed that he had broken the social distancing rules himself to meet his married lover.
Information Requested under Freedom of Information Act 2000
The following information requests are currently being processed.
9 May 2020. Confirmation requested from UK Government on what criteria must be met before “death from Covid-19 virus” can be recorded on certificate, and what guidance has been issued by WHO to UK and Welsh Government on the death recording process. Acknowledgement received from Department of Health and Social Care 9 May 2020. Awaiting reply.
9 May 2020. Confirmation requested from Welsh Government on what criteria must be met before “death from Covid-19 virus” can be recorded on certificate, and what guidance has been issued by WHO to UK and Welsh Government on the death recording process. Awaiting reply.
13 May 2020. Request to BBC for a copy of the guidance provided to BBC by UK Government and / or WHO regarding news coverage during Covid-19 global pandemic. Request acknowledged 15 May 2020 under reference RF120200575. Awaiting reply.
16 May 2020. Request to Welsh Government [WG] for 1] confirmation on whether the 2.0 metre social distance is a statutory requirement or government guidance, and 2] copy of scientific / medical evidence provided to WG to support the 2.0 metre social distance requirement. Awaiting reply.
In America, effective from 4 February 2020, a declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act provides liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against “Covid-19”. The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue a declaration to provide liability immunity to certain individuals and entities against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures, except for claims involving “wilful misconduct” as defined in the PREP Act. The declaration is subject to amendment as circumstances warrant.
The Orwellian society [ as portrayed in “George Orwell 1984“] is around the corner: mass dependency on the state who will control all aspects of our lives. This designed global pandemic is a significant step in that direction.
to be continued . . . . .
Comments in Posts