(Guest Post by Wynne Jones)
Following the kind invitation by Gwilym [Big Gee] to prepare a post for publication on this website, I outline below my personal views on the Covid-19 global pandemic. This post has been prepared in order to generate debate. I welcome counter arguments from those who disagree with my views. Gwilym and I will endeavour to respond to any comments received. I take the view that recent events will lead to a dramatic change in our lifestyle for the reasons set out below.
The coronavirus situation is a narrow and specific problem that required a precise and balanced approach not the mass panic and hysteria generated as a result of economic lock-down, with the healthy [not sick] population quarantined and instructed to stay at home: a decision taken by elected politicians but based on the advice provided by unelected technocrats at a corrupt global organisation now under investigation by USA. I refer to the World Health Organisation [WHO] now primarily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [BMGF] following the decision by USA to withdraw funding pending the outcome of an investigation. Tedros Adhanom is the Director General: an Ethiopian public health researcher who [like the principal funder Bill Gates] is not medically qualified although they both now profess to be “experts” in the medical field.
A Single Global Source of Advice
National governments around the world have responded to the coronavirus situation with similar programmes for action due to the single global source of guidance / information; this being the WHO. On-line guidance, available in multiple languages, and media reports all emanate from that single global source. This suggests that the actions of national governments are directed by unelected technocrats who have the power to inflict significant economic damage on democratically elected governments leading to economic recession / depression in pursuit of their goal of implementing a global vaccination programme. The economic lock-down policy is not endorsed by certain eminent members of the medical profession [including Dr Judy Mikovits and Professor Dolores Cahill] whose views are not reported in the Mainstream Media [MSM].
Global control and manipulation of governments’ heath programmes emanates from a single source. Control that is in the hands of a tiny few extremely powerful, extremely rich and influential cabal; contrary to the impression given that control rests with individual states. World health services are now monopolised by the BMGF with future global vaccination programmes high on the agenda. This will generate massive profits for major pharmaceutical companies. BMGF is a major shareholder and therefore has considerable influence and control.
How The ‘Cabal’ Works Globally
The global cabal, referred to above, operate throughout the world through a subsidiary network of contacts and are in a position to advise national governments, hence the synchronised approach to the response to this situation. The process was initiated in China and then progressed to Europe, Middle East and America. The brutal lock-down in China was used as a template by WHO and replicated in other countries around the world. I take the view that national governments will, as time progresses, be informed by WHO that life can only return to normal when a global vaccination programme is in place. Those that decline to be vaccinated are likely in my view to be denied privileges: for example, they may not be allowed to travel abroad or may be required to quarantine on arrival abroad. Unvaccinated children may not be allowed to attend school i.e. they may need to self-isolate from society as they will be considered to be a risk to the vaccinated population. That argument is illogical. The major pharmaceutical companies, part owned by the BMGF as major shareholder, will develop and deliver the vaccine. This is driven by a global process outside the control of national governments and coordinated by WHO.
Democratic Control and Accountability
The constant repetition by political leaders in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland of the following statement:
Our decisions on lock-down of the economy will be based on scientific advice.
That advice is provided to national governments by WHO. It suggests that decisions on the lock-down of economies in democratic countries is being driven by unelected technocrats.
The Result of Panic
The degree of panic generated by the MSM, controlled by the global cabal, has resulted in people experiencing other potentially life-threatening medical conditions [including cancer, strokes and heart disease] staying away from hospitals or having their diagnosis and treatments postponed. I would argue there is no justification for pausing diagnosis and treatment of cancer and thus creating a spike in future death rate, simply to deal with a coronavirus. The government acknowledges that most of the population will experience mild or no symptoms and even those more seriously affected are likely to make a full recovery. The UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, is a case in point. Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer is of paramount importance and, as many hospitals now have spare capacity, it remains unclear why diagnosis and treatment of cancer, and other life threatening conditions, remains suspended based on advice received from unelected technocrats in a corrupt global organisation now under investigation.
Imperial College London
Have received funding in the sum of £79 Million from the BMGF.
Professor Neil Ferguson, an epidemiologist, using his computer model, predicted huge casualties for the population of UK and USA unless they enacted severe curbs on individual freedoms to lock the nations down. The advice was heeded by UK government in March 2020 and lock-down implemented. On 5 May 2020 Professor Ferguson was required to resign from SAGE [the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies] when media reports revealed that he had broken the social distancing rules himself to meet his married lover. I would respectfully suggest that his actions in requiring the population of UK to comply with his policy of “social distancing” while ignoring the policy himself is hypocritical in the extreme. It suggests that the architect of the social distancing policy does not believe in the policy himself. I leave you to decide whether the projections from his computer model was influenced by the £79 Million funding provided by B&MGF. I take the simplistic view that the acronym GIGO applies to all computer models. [Garbage In, Garbage Out]. As a result of his computer model predictions millions were spend building nightingale hospitals, now “mothballed” and empty.
During this situation pressure has been exerted on the health service in various ways. Healthy nurses and doctors have been forced to self isolate at home while awaiting tests to determine whether they can rejoin their over-worked colleagues. This has placed additional pressures on medical staff working on the “front line”. Certain hospitals have been designated to receive Covid-19 patients and thus overwhelmed on occasion while other hospitals around the world have been forced to lay-off nurses and doctors due to a dramatic reduction in the number of other patients being admitted for cancer and other life-saving diagnosis and treatment. The failure to provide balanced, and factually accurate, reporting during this period with unrelenting propaganda generated by MSM [including the BBC], controlled by the global cabal, is in my view a national scandal. It should be noted that the health services element of BBC news is partly funded by the BMGF. A complaint to the BBC is currently being processed and their response is awaited. My complaint to the BBC relates to the constant reference in BBC News to Covid-19 SEIRUS mathematical computer model. This is a mathematical computer model, developed by Nasarawa State University Keffi Nigeria, to estimate the probability of re-infection with Covid-19 coronavirus, often referred to as the “R” number. The preprint posted 6 April 2020 is not certified by peer review and its validity may therefore be subsequently challenged. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that has not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health related behaviour and should not be reported in news media as established information, as clearly indicated on computer model documentation. This should be clearly explained in news bulletins to avoid providing totally misleading information to the public. I am currently awaiting a formal reply to my complaint. The computer model is not based on scientific fact that has been peer reviewed.
The population of the UK has been subjected by the MSM to daily records of death from Covid-19 virus. I believe it is important to note that, throughout history, people of all ages have died for various reasons and will continue to do so. We have been advised that a young person in his early 20s died from Covid-19 giving the impression that all age groups are at risk. It was only weeks later that it was revealed that the person also had undiagnosed leukaemia. Official records will confirm that the comedian Eddie Large died from Covid-19. He was admitted to hospital with heart failure having suffered from heart disease for a number of years. There is evidence to suggest that over 30,000 people in the UK have not died from Covid-19 virus: no specific test has yet been developed. The qRT-PCR test simply confirms whether a trace of coronavirus has been found in the body. This could even be from a previous flu vaccination. A positive PCR test would require healthy people to incorrectly self-isolate. Their contacts are traced and also required to self isolate thus ensuring maximum disruption to the economy. Healthy people quarantined and effectively placed under “house arrest” by the state [on advice from unelected corrupt technocrats] to perpetuate the fear agenda and to generate totally misleading statistics regarding those infected by the Covid-19 strain of coronavirus.
When this process is over with a detailed investigation to establish liability for unnecessary deaths it will be interesting to see who is held accountable: the scientific advisors with their flawed computer models, the gullible national leaders who accepted the advice without question, or the MSM who propagated the advice, again without question or scrutiny. I take the view that when fact is separated from propaganda truth emerges.
To those who question how this can be controlled through the BMGF please take time to undertake the research and follow the money route. Who funds Imperial College London to the tune of £280 million. Who built the computer model used to convince UK and USA to lock-down their economies, build Nightingale hospitals [now unused and mothballed]. It is not unreasonable to ask whether UK and USA continue to have confidence in this flawed computer model, given that the model developer [Professor Neil Ferguson] has been required to resign as government advisor. Those now examining the model design in detail have found significant flaws and yet the model predictions continue to drive government policy and process and reports in the MSM. The Imperial College code provides different answers using the same inputs. In particular, the same assumptions can provide results that differ by 80,000 deaths over a span of 80 days. There are apparently myriad other problems as well including undocumented codes and numerous bugs. This is not the first time bad computer models have made their way into policy. Statistical models can be useful tools for guiding policy, but they are only as credible as the assumptions on which they are based. It is fundamentally important for models used in policy to be made publicly available, have assumptions clearly stated, and have their robustness to changes to these assumptions tested. Models also need to be updated as time goes on in line with the best available evidence. The Imperial College model didn’t meet any of these criteria. And, sadly, the model was relied on as the basis for locking down two countries UK and USA.
National leaders need to acknowledge that the computer models [funded through the BMGF] driving government policy are fundamentally flawed and have resulted in unnecessary deaths. National [not global] control needs to be re-established. Eminent members of the medical profession [including Professor Dolores Cahill] need to guide and steer government policy. Urgent change in policy direction is required to avoid further unnecessary deaths and to avoid economic collapse leading to recession / depression.
We now have an army of recruits employed to track and trace our movements in order to gather and input data to a flawed computer model. Logic dictates that flawed predictions will be generated to guide government policy and process. Given the severe adverse medical and economic impact detailed scrutiny of model data input and assumptions is required. A few obvious questions that deserve answers are listed below in bullet point format.
- What is the science behind the 2 metre social distance rule embedded in the model. Has this been subjected to peer review.
- Why are model outputs [forecasts] reported on a daily basis by the MSM as fact when the following warning note is presented by model designer.
Caution: Peprints are preliminary reports of work that has not been certified by peer review.
They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behaviour and should not be reported in news media as established information.
- How are death statistics recorded and collated. What criteria must be met before death from Covid-19 is confirmed. There is a significant difference between recording death from Covid-19 virus and recording death with a corona virus. The latter suggests that anyone dying from whatever cause with a trace of coronavirus detected can be re-classified as a Covid-19 death thus dramatically distorting the death statistics and perpetuating the fear agenda to justify continued lock-down of the economy.
- How is a “positive PCR test result” defined for data input to model.
- How is “quarantine” defined for data input to model. Does this refer to the quarantine of the healthy population due to the “stay at home” lock-down rule introduced under emergency powers, or does it refer to the quarantine of sections of the population considered to be sick.
This situation should not be considered a global pandemic. It is certainly a global plandemic with the plan rapidly unravelling as more and more people decide to undertake research and follow the money trail back to a single source of global control: the BMGF funded WHO, and a corrupt trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry with vaccine and drug scandals dating back decades. The recent decision by the American President Donald Trump to withhold funding to WHO pending the outcome of an investigation is long overdue and is to be commended. Consider why the big pharmaceutical companies would need to negotiate with national governments with a view to being indemnified from legal action resulting from any death or health issue following the roll-out of a new Covid-19 vaccine [yes, vaccine not virus] at speed circumventing normal safety protocols. You will no doubt recall the devastating effects of the drug thalidomide. Adequate testing of new vaccines and drugs and safety protocols are in place for a reason and should not be circumvented.
America is currently a very sick society. Like many other nations they have been “encouraged / persuaded” to take drugs and vaccines for decades. It is hardly surprising they are dropping like flies when a relatively benign coronavirus is in circulation. It is not in the interests of big pharmaceutical companies to have a healthy population it is in their interests to have a sick population. It is a corrupt trillion dollar industry with scandals dating back decades to the AIDS / HIV pandemic. The evidence is there for those who choose to do the research.
In America, hospitals receive substantial additional funding if they decide to place patients on ventilators or if they are prepared to reclassify patients as dying from Covid-19 rather than other causes [terminal cancer, hart failure etc]. Hospitals, desperate to receive funding to avoid having to lay off nurses and doctors, comply with the instructions, hence the alarming Covid-19 death statistics generated in USA. Patients testing positive for Covid-19 are directed to hospital ICU thus overwhelming that sector of the health service while other hospitals are under capacity. The new Nightingale hospital in London [capacity 4000 patients] was “mothballed” in May 2020 as it is not now required. Those in control will argue that non-use demonstrates that the policy of social distancing and the lock-down of the economy has worked and therefore we need further lock-downs and social isolation when the second and third wave of the “virus” hit us.
Diseases such as the unidentified and as yet un-isolated covid-19 and other corona based viruses like influenza can be fatal due to an overreaction of the body’s immune system called a cytokine storm. Cytokines are small proteins released by many different cells in the body, including those of the immune system, where they coordinate the body’s response against infection and trigger inflammation. Sometimes the body’s response to infection can go into overdrive. For example, when SARS -CoV-2 – the virus behind the covid-19 pandemic – enters the lungs, it triggers an immune response, attracting immune cells to the region to attack the virus, resulting in localised inflammation. But in some patients, excessive or uncontrolled levels of cytokines are released which then activate more immune cells, resulting in hyperinflammation. This can seriously harm or even kill the patient. When offered it last year, I declined to accept seasonal flu vaccine. I shall also decline to accept any future new vaccine developed for the Covid-19 strain of coronavirus.
When you view the statistics, there are more fatalities from seasonal flu, globally than have arisen from this mystery virus. That indicates that it is not particularly aggressive or fatal compared to what we face annually. The other statistic, which cannot be ignored is that the annual death rate from ALL diseases worldwide is no greater than the normal average, and is in fact below average, when compared to e.g. the deaths in 2017, which was boosted by a particularly nasty ordinary seasonal flu virus. The statistics are freely available.
When it comes to tests, there is NO test for a specific virus during this outbreak. The test confirms that you have RNA/DNA genetic remnants of a corona virus – not specifically covid-19. If you’ve had a corona virus infection in the past, or have been vaccinated against flu with corona virus RNA injected into you to trigger an immune response (as most of us have at some time in our lives) then the qRT-PCR test will show that. However that is then recorded as a positive for covid-19 infection, which is not accurate and is in fact totally misleading and false. Manufacturer of “SARS-CoV-2 Corona-virus Multiplex qRT-PCR kit” has advised that it should only be used for research purposes and not for diagnostic applications as it has not yet been clinically validated.
Everyone’s fear of death has been triggered, and the ensuing panic has manifested itself. The result of a purposely generated fear and panic has been brought about for sinister reasons. Never in the history of mankind have healthy people been quarantined, only the sick ones. What we are experiencing is something far darker and sinister – for ulterior motives.
The global cabal driving this process can initiate a second and third wave of fear at a time of their choosing. Any future spike in death rate for whatever reason [seasonal flu, 5-G radiation etc] can be blamed on Covid-19. The global cabal driving this process is rich enough and powerful enough to direct actions of national governments. The UK government alone has borrowed 400 billion pounds due to economic lock-down crippling the economy for years to come. It will take decades to repay borrowed money and taxation for those that will still have employment at the end of this process will escalate accordingly. Those employed in small businesses driven into bankruptcy through the policy of “social distancing” will be dependent on the state and they will obey the state or they will not receive their pittance every month to survive. The 1% global cabal driving this process will become richer and the 99% will become poorer and dependent on the state for their survival. It will be extremely difficult for any small business and the hospitality industry to survive financially under social distancing policy. The policy will remain in place until the global cabal driving this achieve one of their objectives: a global vaccination programme generating billions for the big pharmaceutical companies. I take the view that normal life will not now return as global control rests with 1% unelected technocrats who can direct the actions of democratically elected governments. There is now overwhelming evidence of global [not national] control. Countries around the world are using the same “virus” testing kit, the same false method of death recording, the same computer model that has not been peer reviewed.
On a more positive note, many eminent members of the medical profession [including Professors Cahill, Mikovits, Wittkowski and Dr Tenpenny, Kaufman, Battar, Shiva and many others] are now speaking out and are appalled at the way this situation is being managed. The brave actions of Professor Cahill is to be particularly commended in taking action to challenge the political system for crimes against humanity and to hold political leaders, their scientific advisors and the MSM accountable for their actions through due legal process.
Restrictions to human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to data protection, under current emergency powers should be limited in time. If they involve personal data processing, the basic principles of Convention 108 Council of Europe Treaty should be respected, and the rights of data subjects guaranteed. There is a need for scrutiny with regard to “track and trace” phone apps now being tested, and rolled out for wider use, to ensure personal data is anonymised.
There has been a rapid roll-out of 5-G technology during Covid-19 lock-down period. No protests are possible due to restrictions on social gatherings. 5-G technology poses potential hazards for human health and the environment. The technology has not been investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5-G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. 5-G signals have higher frequency and shorter wavelengths, which mean the distance between the device and the “tower”, must be shorter.
I welcome positive or negative comments to generate debate on this very important issue. Gwilym and myself will do our best to respond to any comments received.
Thank you for taking the time to read the document.