So – They’ve FINALLY Admitted It – The World Health Organisation (WHO). – Fall On Their Sword

So – They’ve FINALLY Admitted It – The World Health Organisation (WHO). – Fall On Their Sword

The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction – 

The test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the  SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of  a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Corman Drosten Study)

Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they nonetheless recommend “Re-testing” (which everybody knows is a ridiculous impossibility). The damage has been done by now.

Our Past Warnings Based On Facts

In previous articles (including the now dated video above), BGB has repeatedly pointed out the flaws in the RT-PCR test – even the inventor of the technique (Dr. Kary Mullis) went on record to say that it should NOT be used for diagnostic purposes – it’s not the purpose it was designed for (Dr. Mullis who won a Nobel prize for his work sadly passed away in August 2018).

All test kits carry a warning that it should ONLY be used for ‘laboratory use’. Do we think that the WHO was not aware of this right at the start of the declaration that there was a (hoax) ‘pandemic’ on the loose? Absolutely not – they and the rest of the Cabal used the improperly used RT-PCR test technique to frighten everyone out of their skin, as the false positive test numbers rose and the media duped people into thinking that represented infectious ‘cases’. They even used the word ‘case’ instead of ‘unconfirmed positive results’, making the rhetoric a ‘casedemic’ and not a pandemic – which it never was. And it  provided the excuse for the collapse of the world economy and the removal of rights and freedoms from the people, with the eventual goal of vaccinating everyone on earth with experimental gene altering concoctions. That was the plan all along – vaccination.

View Published CASEDEMIC Article

also

View Published RT-PCR Article

Those articles were published on October the 1st and 10th 2020. BGB has been pointing out this amazing lie  since March 2020 – so it’s taken the WHO TEN months to admit what we knew in March 2020! Incredible! The reality is of course that the net is closing on their scam and people are waking up to it. Hence this big step back from the lies with a carefully worded admission.

Ct (Amplification or Cycle Thresholds)

The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al.

The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture . . . . .

See Corman Drosten Study link in first paragraph above.

At this point it should be noted that the actual SARS Covid-2 virus (that is presumed to cause the disease Covid-19) has NEVER been isolated, identified or it’s entire genome sequenced. It is a hypothetical theory. How can a hypothetical virus that has not been identified or sequenced be discovered by ANY test?

The Big Admission

The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35

cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020,  in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.

If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 14 months are invalid.

The Ct rate applied by most labs in the UK has been 40 – 45 cycles. In the USA Ct rates have been set at 45 and even 50 cycles by some!

According to Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, et althe Ct > 35 has been the norm “in most laboratories in Europe & the US”.

Below is the WHO’s carefully formulated “Retraction”.

The full text with link to the original document is in annex – 1 at the foot of this page:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed

(1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology. (emphasis added)

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases

(2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

“Invalid Positives” is the Underlying Concept 

This is not an issue of  “Weak Positives” and “Risk of False Positive Increases”. What is at stake is a “Flawed Methodology” which leads to invalid estimates.

What this admission of the WHO confirms is that the estimate of Covid positive from a PCR test (with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles or higher) is invalid. In which case, the WHO recommends retesting:  “a new specimen should be taken and retested . . . 

That recommendation is pro-forma. It won’t happen. Millions of people Worldwide have already been tested, starting in early February 2020. Nonetheless, we must conclude that unless retested, those estimates (according to the WHO) are invalid.  I should mention that there are several other flaws regarding the PCR test which are not addressed in this article. Further information contained in this BGB Fact Sheet:

RT_PCR_Fact_Sheet


From the outset, the PCR test has routinely been applied at a Ct amplification threshold of 35 or higher, following the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO. What this means is that the PCR methodology as applied Worldwide has in the course of  the last 12-14 months led to the compilation of faulty and misleading Covid statistics.

And these are the statistics which are used to measure the progression of the so-called “pandemic”. Above an amplification cycle of 35 or higher, the test will not detect the virus. Therefore,  the numbers are meaningless.

It follows that there is no scientific basis for confirming the existence of a pandemic.

Which in turn means that the lockdown / economic measures which have resulted in social panic, mass poverty and unemployment (allegedly to curtail the spread of the virus) have no justification whatsoever.

According to scientific opinion:

if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%  (Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Craig, Kevin McKernan, et al, Critique of Drosten Study)

As outlined above, “the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%”: It follows that using  the >35 cycles detection will indelibly  contribute to “hiking up” the number of “fake positives”.

At the time of writing, despite the WHO retraction, the PCT test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to sustaining the fear campaign, justifying the ongoing lockdown policies as well as the implementation of the Covid vaccine.

Ironically, the flawed numbers based on “invalid positives” are in turn being manipulated to ensure an upward trend in Covid positives.

Moreover, those PCR tests are not routinely accompanied by a medical diagnosis of the patients who are being tested.

And now, national health authorities have issued (fake) warnings of a “Third Wave” as part of their propaganda campaign in support of the Covid-19 ‘Vaccine’ or as it should be correctly labelled – an experimental gene modifying mRNA inoculation. NEVE$R before tried on humans, and over two decades has been found to be fatal in animal tests, when the test subject later comes in contact with a ‘wild’ virus in the corona family.

Absolutely No scientific basis for implementing the Covid ‘Vaccine’

The WHO confirms that the Covid PCR test procedure as applied is invalid.

Both the WHO and the scientific assessment of Pieter Borger, et al (quoted above) confirm unequivocally that the tests adopted by governments to justify the lockdown and the destabilization of national economies are INVALID.

It should be understood that these “invalid estimates” are the numbers quoted relentlessly 24/7 by the media in the course of the First and Second (pretend)Wave, which have been used to feed the fear campaign and “justify” ALL the policies put forth by the governments: lockdown, closure of economic activity, social distancing, face mask, curfew, as well as the vaccine. 

Invalid Data. Think Twice Before Getting Vaccinated with the experimental gene altering mRNA jab.

And now we have entered a so-called “Third Wave”. (where’s the data??)

It’s a complex “pack of lies”.

It’s a crime against humanity. 

Annex – 1

Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Technologies that Use Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Date: 13 January 2021                                                                      

WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Purpose of this notice: clarify information previously provided by WHO. This notice supersedes WHO Information Notice for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device (IVD) Users 2020/05 version 1, issued 14 December 2020.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

Actions to be taken by IVD users:

  1. Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.
  2. Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.
  3. Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.
  4. Provide the Ct value in the report to the requesting health care provider.

Notes

1. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020, WHO reference number WHO/2019-nCoV/laboratory/2020.6.

2. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102.


The original source material for this article has been provided by Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Additional material, edits and formatting by BGB. March 22, 2021


SUBSCRIBE for free to receive automated notifications of new posts from BGB in your e-mail inbox – as they’re published. You can unsubscribe at any time you choose.

Please enter your details below and click 'Subscribe'
Loading


Bookmark

No account yet? Register

Related Posts

UK Government Latest Reports 847 Deaths, 12 Brain Injuries, 112 Blind Following mRNA ‘Corona’ Shots

UK Government Latest Reports 847 Deaths, 12 Brain Injuries, 112 Blind Following mRNA ‘Corona’ Shots

We Are the Resistance and We WILL WIN  This War

We Are the Resistance and We WILL WIN This War

Max Igan From Down Under & David Icke From Up Here Plus Pugilist Families

Max Igan From Down Under & David Icke From Up Here Plus Pugilist Families

The Lie They Cannot Afford To Let Go Of

The Lie They Cannot Afford To Let Go Of

No Comment

Leave a Reply

Covid-19 Latest News Update

Had an injection? Report any deaths/ bad reactions here

Official Death and Adverse Reactions Data (Note: only between 1 & 10% of actual events are officially reported/recorded)

Your Data Protection – Get BRAVE Web Browser

Site Contents Accuracy

Write a Letter to Your MP

Protests Noticeboard

Fact Sheets

Communicable Diseases

Face Covering Exemption

Subscribe to NEW POST Notifications

Please enter your details below and click 'Subscribe'
Loading

Correspondence From BGB – click on the ‘Correspondence Journal’ graphic ABOVE for full details or click on the ‘Ticker Tape’ item below:

A Dissiden’t Guide To The Constitution

Recommended External Sites

Recent Posts

Comments in Posts

Archives

Categories

An Offer You Can’t Refuse!