Experimental Vaccine – Information That Is Hidden By The Mainstream Media

23 January 2021 / / 2 Comments

Foreword By BGB

The main article below is information that has been forwarded to BGB via e-mail from America’s Frontline Doctors (A.F.D.).

Whilst it is mainly pertinent to the American population – as the organisation (AFD) was founded and is based in the USA –  the information contained in the White Paper below is exactly the same for all countries globally.

This information is closely locked down by the MSM – no one hears of it. Instead the MSM are aggressively pushing the Bill Gates funded W.H.O. and government agenda to get the whole population vaccinated. However, it’s extremely important that EVERYONE is made aware of the complete picture, so that they can make a proper INFORMED DECISION regarding whether they want to be guinea pigs for what amounts to an experiment. The public, basing their decision on just the information they are fed as state propaganda is not enough.

This experimental vaccine roll-out is in absolute contravention of the established Nuremberg Code.

The Nuremberg Code

The indictment of the defendants was filed on October 25, 1946, 25 days after the conclusion of the first Nuremberg trial by the International Military Tribunal. The ‘Doctors’ Trial’ began on December 9, 1946, and ended on July 19, 1947.

The main trial at Nuremberg after World War II was conducted by the International Military Tribunal. The tribunal was made up of judges from the four allied powers (the United States, Britain, France, and the former Soviet Union) and was charged with trying Germany’s major war criminals. After this first-of-its-kind international trial, the United States conducted 12 additional trials of representative Nazis from various sectors of the Third Reich, including law, finance, ministry, and manufacturing, before American Military Tribunals, also at Nuremberg.

The first of these trials, (the Doctors’ Trial), involved 23 defendants, all but 3 of whom were physicians accused of murder and torture in the conduct of medical experiments.

Quoted from the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.

The Code was formulated 50 years ago, in August 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, by judges sitting in judgment of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments (the so-called Doctors’ Trial) It served as a blueprint for today’s principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research. Because of its link with the horrors of World War II and the use of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps for medical experimentation, debate continues today about the authority of the Code remains in force, in modern medical research. The chief prosecutor at the Doctors’ Trial, General Telford Taylor, believed that one of the three U.S. judges, Harold Sebring, was the author of the Code. Two physicians who helped prosecute the Nazi doctors at Nuremberg, Leo Alexander and Andrew Ivy, have each been identified as the Code’s author. A careful reading of the transcript of the Doctors’ Trial, background documents, and the final judgment reveals that authorship was shared and that the famous 10 principles of the Code grew out of the trial itself.

Main Article

The Following Has Been Authored By America’s Frontline Doctors

The EXPERIMENTAL COVID Vaccine…

  • Has No Independently Published Animal Studies
  • Shows No Proof That It Stops Transmission of the Virus
  • Carries The Possibility of Lifelong Infertility

Excerpts from the 30-page white paper…

America’s Frontline Doctors White Paper On Experimental Vaccines For COVID-19

This document represents the preliminary findings of an investigation conducted by the member-physicians of America’s Frontline Doctors. We are recommending caution for patients and policy makers and employers. Additional transparency and more research are needed before we ask Americans to embark on the largest experimental medical program in US history. The unknowns must be addressed through a scientifically rigorous process. Mandates for experimental medical therapies are neither permissible nor advisable. Ordinary Americans should not be compelled to sign up for a “vaccine passport” or similar mandate just to travel on an airplane or see a concert with friends. The potential for third-party abuse of private health information and real medical risk to individuals remains much too high. Concentrations of private power pose a threat to privacy and other civil liberties and policy makers must proceed with caution.

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon Demand That The Studies Should Not Be Continued…

Many scientists already agree the risk is much too high to proceed with these experimental vaccines. On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned 27 scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

The Department of Defence of the Federal Government Has Contracted With Google and Oracle to Track Vaccinated Persons…

The Department of Defence of the federal government has contracted with Google and Oracle to track vaccinated persons. In the document entitled “From the Factory to the Frontlines,” the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Defence (DOD) stated that, because ‘Warp Speed’ vaccine candidates use new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “have limited previous data on safety in humans . . . the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 (post-licensure) clinical trials.” The vaccination effort itself (OWS) is being managed by the military with the DHS and NSA as opposed to what is usually done, which is civilian health agencies.

There is Evidence to Support That the Experimental Vaccine Could Cause Permanent Auto-Immune Rejection of the Placenta…

Frontline physicians have a very healthy respect for what is unknown. With these new experimental vaccines more is unknown than known, so this section is by definition, incomplete. But we already have suggestions of where serious problems will arise, based upon early data and mechanism of action. There is evidence to support that the vaccine could cause permanent auto-immune rejection of the placenta. Placental inflammation resulting in stillbirths mid-pregnancy (second trimester) is seen with COVID-19 and with other similar coronaviruses. The way the experimental vaccines work, it is concerning that that deleterious effect on the placenta, which in the wild only lasts as long as the acute illness, would instead be lifelong.

This is becoming a very real danger.

People should never be pressured to comply with taking an experimental vaccine. This is becoming a very real danger. The coercion can be implemented by government legislation or through policy directives by large private and public corporations, including airlines, employers, schools, and other institutions. This type of assault on your medical privacy is invasive, aggressive, and unethical.

SUBSCRIBE for free to receive automated notifications of new posts from BGB in your e-mail inbox – as they’re published. You can unsubscribe at any time you choose.

Please enter your details below and click 'Subscribe'

 

Bookmark
Please login to bookmark Close

Covid-19, Health, Vaccines

2 Comments

  1. Laurence Howell

    Health Impact News,

    CDC stops reporting adverse drug reactions to the new mRNA vaccines.

    by Brian Shilhavy
    Editor, Health Impact News

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just released its weekly Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), and for the second week in a row, there is no new data on adverse reactions to the two FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) COVID mRNA injections.

    The last report on the experimental injections and the adverse side effects was from January 6, 2021, and only covered the first week of injections with the experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA shots, with an emphasis on allergic reactions and anaphylaxis shock.

    The report on January 6th did not cover the Moderna injections which have also received emergency use authorization by the FDA.

    Injuries and deaths due to the experimental COVID injections are being reported in the U.S. and around the world, so why is the CDC not examining these adverse side effects and reporting on them?

    The lack of reporting certainly cannot be blamed on the change in administrations, because an MMWR report was published this week and covered the following topics:

    COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Efforts from Health Departments — United States, June 25–July 24, 2020
    Evaluation of Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Two Community-Based Testing Sites — Pima County, Arizona, November 3–17, 2020
    Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Lineage — United States, December 29, 2020–January 12, 2021
    COVID-19 Trends Among Persons Aged 0–24 Years — United States, March 1–December 12, 2020
    One would imagine that the largest mass vaccination campaign in our nation’s history under Operation Warp Speed would be the primary focus of any weekly morbidity and mortality reports.

    We know there is a lot more data now since the January 6th report, as adverse reactions from the COVID injections are being entered into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), although this is a voluntary system that few people know about, and is seldom used, so it only reflects a small percentage of adverse reactions, well below 10 percent.

    As of last week, fifty-five people in the United States have died after receiving a COVID-19 injection, 96 life-threatening events have been reported, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits. See:

    55 Americans Have Died Following mRNA COVID Injections as Norway Death Toll Rises To 29
    The CDC has an app called “V-safe” that is given to everyone who receives an experimental COVID injection to provide “health check-ins,” and would contain far more data than the VAERS database, but the CDC has not issued any reports from this data since January 6th.

    What are They Hiding?
    Since nurse manager Tiffany Dover from CHI Memorial Hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee, passed out on live camera shortly after receiving the experimental Pfizer COVID injection, and then disappeared from her social media accounts prompting many to question why and revealing two different sources that reported her alleged death, there has been an obvious cover-up of some of these adverse reactions to the COVID injections.

    The hospital produced a video claiming to include Tiffany Dover, but they did a poor job and it was easily discovered that she was not actually in the video, and that the hospital was covering something up.

    To this day she still has not been heard from, and her memory may soon vanish completely if people don’t demand to have the hospital provide the truth.

    See:
    Is the Tennessee Nurse Who Passed Out on Live Camera After the COVID Vaccine Still Alive?
    And while the last CDC report from January 6th highlighted allergic reactions and anaphylaxis shock, we know that other high-profile cases that went viral showed uncontrollable seizures and other potential neurological damage, such as the 56-year-old medical doctor in Florida whose death following the injection is allegedly being investigated.

    His wife took the story of her husband’s death to several large media outlets to publish, forcing them to deal with it. How many other deaths are being covered up like Tiffany Dover’s, possibly by even threatening family members, is currently unknown.

    The Corrupt CDC Serves Big Pharma, NOT Public Health
    On January 10, 2021, Health Impact News published an article written by Adam Dick of The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. See:

    24 Dead and 137 Infected at NY Nursing Home After Experimental COVID Injections
    Adam’s article quoted statistics from Syracuse.com that stated 24 people died in a nursing home in Auburn, New York, after being injected with one of the experimental COVID injections:

    James T. Mulder wrote Saturday at syracuse.com that until December 29 there had been no coronavirus deaths at The Commons. December 29, when deaths of residents with coronavirus began occurring at The Commons, is also, Mulder’s article discloses, seven days days after the nursing home began giving coronavirus vaccinations to residents, with 80 percent of residents so far having been vaccinated.

    Over a period of less than two weeks since December 29, Mulder relates that 24 coronavirus-infected residents at the 300-bed nursing home have died.

    Is the timing just a strange coincidence?

    Notice that all Adam did was quote the facts from the article, and then ask a question about those facts.

    A reporter claiming to work for USA Today, Camille Caldera , sent me an email stating her intention to defame and slander Health Impact News over this article via her “fact checking”:

    My name is Camille Caldera and I am a reporter for USA TODAY. I am currently fact checking a story on your website, linked here: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/24-dead-and-137-infected-at-ny-nursing-home-after-experimental-covid-injections/.

    The story is misleading in its implication that an outbreak of COVID-19 at a nursing home was related to vaccinations.

    The outbreak at the nursing home in question began on Dec. 21. The nursing home began vaccinating its residents on Dec. 22. That is clear in the article on Syracuse.com that your story refers to, linked here: https://www.syracuse.com/coronavirus/2021/01/covid-19-outbreak-at-auburn-nursing-home-infects-137-residents-kills-24.html.

    It’s also not possible for the COVID-19 shot in the U.S. to infect its recipient. None of the authorized and recommended COVID-19 vaccines or COVID-19 vaccines currently in development in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, linked here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html.

    As a result, I am rating it MISSING CONTEXT.

    Camille Caldera
    ccaldera@usatoday.com
    301-454-9992

    Notice that not a single thing in the article we published from The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity is inaccurate.

    In short, it is “missing context” because we did not give the CDC perspective, which the Pharma-funded corporate media regards as the gospel truth, and never even bothers to do the job of a REAL investigative reporter, which is to investigate what the Government is claiming as true and hold them accountable if they are misrepresenting the truth.

    There is actually no proof to the CDC’s claims that “a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”

    In fact, there is an abundance of evidence that it does actually make people sick with COVID-19, as health authorities in Israel have just published:

    12,400 People in Israel Tested Positive for Coronavirus AFTER Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Shot
    So here are some facts about the CDC that I am sure you will never read at the USA Today, or any other Pharma-owned corporate media outlet.

    First, the CDC is the largest purchaser of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma. See:

    Should the CDC Oversee Vaccine Safety When They Purchase Over $5 Billion of Vaccines from Big Pharma?
    Do you think this might be a conflict of interest??

    Secondly, the CDC owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source.)

    Do you think this might be a conflict of interest??

  2. Big Gee (Post author)

    An excellent contribution there Laurence!

    It stinks doesn’t it? It should be obvious to a child, but it seems that the masses are totally caught up in the fear mongering, and don’t go further than their television set for information.

    Real news blackout, the censoring of anything that questions the ‘official’ line and the pathetic attacks on truth seekers is still the most potent weapon in their arsenal. The media and the Silicon Valley monopolies are the main culprits.

    Owning and manipulating the media was a master stroke by the Cabal. I also notice that now anything put into the Google search engine about anyone who is exposing the truth is relegated right down the list of search results, only to be replaced by ‘fact checking’ material, mostly contributed by some pimply faced teenager in his bedroom that gets paid to to try and debunk the information that experts in their field are providing.

    Sickening is not a powerful enough word for it.

Leave a Reply

© 2025 Big Gee's BLOG

Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑