{"id":7162,"date":"2021-03-11T06:41:40","date_gmt":"2021-03-11T06:41:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/?p=7162"},"modified":"2021-03-11T06:43:52","modified_gmt":"2021-03-11T06:43:52","slug":"mhra-data-shows-women-who-have-lost-their-baby-as-a-result-of-covid-jab-doubles-in-just-7-days","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/index.php\/2021\/03\/11\/mhra-data-shows-women-who-have-lost-their-baby-as-a-result-of-covid-jab-doubles-in-just-7-days\/","title":{"rendered":"MHRA Data Shows Women Who Have Lost Their Baby As a Result Of a Covid Jab Doubles In Just 7 Days"},"content":{"rendered":"

It saddens us to have to report that as a result of receiving a dose of either the Pfizer \/ BioNTech MRNA vaccine or the Oxford \/ Astrazeneca Viral Vector (still mRNA technology), a total of twenty women have now had to suffer the grief of having a miscarriage and losing their unborn child.<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Adverse reactions to both jabs\u00a0reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme up to the 21st February<\/a><\/span><\/span> shows that the number has almost doubled in just seven days when compared with the previous weeks data, which included adverse reactions to both jabs. As of the 14th of February 2021, a total of eleven women had lost their baby with three of those being due to the Oxford vaccine and eight of those being due to the Pfizer vaccine.<\/p>\n

The MHRA Yellow Card data now shows that the Oxford jab has caused four women to sadly lose their unborn child, an increase of one on the previous weeks data.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

However the Pfizer jab has now caused, as of the 21st of February, a total of sixteen women to sadly lose their unborn child, a figure which has doubled from the eight seen in the previous week up to the 14th of February.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

As of the 14th of February there had been 8.3 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine administered, with the Oxford jab lagging behind by 1.4 million at just 6.9 million doses administered. But fast forward to the 21st of February, a further 1.1 million doses of the Pfizer jab were administered, and a further 1.5 million doses of the Oxford jab.<\/p>\n

However the number of adverse reactions to the Oxford jab is nearly double than what has been reported for the Pfizer jab, with 157,637 adverse reactions to the Oxford Jab being reported, compared with 85,179 adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab being reported as of the 21st of February 2021.<\/p>\n

Whilst the Oxford vaccine outnumbers the Pfizer jab significantly in terms of adverse reactions, the data now clearly shows the Pfizer jab to be much more dangerous when it comes to being administered to pregnant women.<\/p>\n

But why is this happening?<\/h3>\n

Well when the Pfizer jab was first approved for emergency use only in the United Kingdom, meaning the manufacturer is not liable for any harm or injury caused by their product, the Government\u2019s advice was as follows \u2013<\/p>\n

Pregnancy<\/strong><\/em><\/h4>\n
\n

There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
\nAnimal reproductive toxicity studies\u00a0have not been completed<\/strong>. COVID-19 mRNA\u00a0Vaccine
\nBNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy<\/strong><\/em>\u2018<\/p>\n

\u2018For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
\nof childbearing age should be advised to\u00a0avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after<\/strong>\u00a0their second dose.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This was taken from a document released by the Government titled \u2018REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS\u2019, of which\u00a0we reported to you back in December 2020<\/a><\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n

However the\u00a0Government\u00a0<\/a>has\u00a0<\/a>since updated it\u2019s advice<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>within the document, for reasons unknown to the following:<\/p>\n

\n

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
\nPregnancy
\n<\/strong>There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
\nAnimal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
\nembryo\/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
\nthe COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy\u00a0should only be considered\u00a0<\/strong>when the\u00a0potential
\nbenefits<\/strong>\u00a0outweigh any\u00a0potential risks<\/strong>\u00a0for the\u00a0mother<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0foetus.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

How many more women need to suffer a miscarriage to stop this madness?<\/h2>\n

So now we know why pregnant women have started to be inoculated with the experimental jabs, because the Government quietly changed its own advice based on zero evidence to support it. Even going as far as to remove the recommendation that women of child bearing age being told to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.<\/p>\n

Statistically these women stood no chance of suffering from serious illness due to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and the alleged resulting disease Covid-19, (total recovery rate = 99.97%<\/span><\/strong>, fatalities = 0.03%<\/span><\/strong> with an average age of 84 – with underlying serious health problems prior to infection, which they may have died of anyway). You work out the overall risk for yourself.<\/p>\n

Now sadly those in the 0.03% group who are pregnant may have to suffer the misery of losing their unborn baby. Furthermore, with a big question mark over their future fertility through this injection, they may have lost the only child they could ever have.<\/p>\n

BE SURE THAT YOUR CHOICE TO GET VACCINATED WITH AN UNTESTED EXPERIMENTAL INOCULATION IS AN INFORMED CHOICE<\/span>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

And The Final Word Goes To “The Old Man In A Chair”<\/h2>\n