{"id":7152,"date":"2021-03-23T12:31:21","date_gmt":"2021-03-23T12:31:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/?p=7152"},"modified":"2021-03-23T12:31:21","modified_gmt":"2021-03-23T12:31:21","slug":"why-would-anyone-choose-to-receive-an-experimental-covid-mrna-injection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/index.php\/2021\/03\/23\/why-would-anyone-choose-to-receive-an-experimental-covid-mrna-injection\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Would Anyone Choose to Receive an Experimental COVID mRNA Injection?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Preamble<\/h2>\n

Credits: Original article by <\/span>Brian Shilhavy. Reproduced by BGB with some editorial<\/span>\u00a0 content and formatting changes<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Sombre Documentation<\/h2>\n

The headlines and subject matter of our articles over the past few weeks have been very sombre, documenting how serious injuries and deaths are happening just shortly after people have been injected with one of the two experimental mRNA COVID injections by either Pfizer, Astra Zeneca or Moderna.<\/p>\n

Big Pharma, the Governments, and the Pharma-controlled media continue to try and downplay these deaths and injuries, denying that they have any relationship to receiving these COVID injections. That is a bare faced LIE!<\/p>\n

However, the evidence that we have presented here, paints a very different picture, suggesting that this issue is far more serious than the corporate media, and even most in the alternative media, are reporting.<\/p>\n

So this begs the question: Why would anyone choose to receive one of these injections in the first place?<\/p>\n

Most people who have received one of these injections, or plan to receive one, would probably answer something like:<\/p>\n

\n

To prevent me from getting the COVID-19 virus, or prevent me from spreading it to others.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

For those of us trying to shine truth and light into darkness and deception, I really think this is where the conversation needs to begin.<\/p>\n

For those who are less informed and simply have a religious-like faith in vaccines in general, and the experimental COVID injections specifically, without ever having spent much time actually researching them, we need to stop defending what we have learned, and instead ask them to defend their faith in these shots, and then be prepared to answer their positive beliefs in these shots with verifiable facts that they can look up and research themselves.<\/p>\n

What Does the FDA Say About the Experimental COVID Shots?<\/h2>\n

So let\u2019s begin with what the official FDA guidelines, published on the FDA government website, state as facts regarding these injections.<\/p>\n

For the \u201cPfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine\u201d you can find the FDA\u2019s\u00a0Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine<\/em><\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0and the\u00a0Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers<\/em><\/a>\u00a0on the\u00a0FDA website here<\/a><\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n

For the \u201cModerna COVID-19 Vaccine\u201d you can find the FDA\u2019s\u00a0Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/em>and the\u00a0Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers<\/em><\/a>\u00a0on the\u00a0FDA website here<\/a><\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n

Fact #1<\/span> \u2013 These \u201cvaccines\u201d are NOT approved by the FDA.<\/h3>\n

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

HAS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE BEEN USED BEFORE? The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

HAS THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE BEEN USED BEFORE? The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Fact #2<\/span> \u2013 Risks to these Unapproved Vaccines are UNKNOWN<\/h3>\n

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>for Recipients and Caregivers<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/span>,<\/p>\n

After giving a list of possible side effects, then states:<\/p>\n

\n

These may not be all the possible side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine<\/em><\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>gives a more comprehensive list of Serious Adverse Events:<\/p>\n

\n

*\u00a0Serious adverse events are defined as<\/strong>:
\n\u2022 Death;
\n\u2022 A life-threatening adverse event;
\n\u2022 Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
\n\u2022 A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
\n\u2022 A congenital anomaly\/birth defect;
\n\u2022 An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>for Recipients and Caregivers<\/em><\/a><\/strong>,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

After giving a list of possible side effects, then states:<\/p>\n

\n

These may not be all the possible side effects of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Gives a more comprehensive list of Serious Adverse Events:<\/p>\n

\n

*Serious adverse events are defined as<\/strong>:
\n\u2022 Death;
\n\u2022 A life-threatening adverse event;
\n\u2022 Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
\n\u2022 A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
\n\u2022 A congenital anomaly\/birth defect;
\n\u2022 An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Fact #3<\/span> \u2013 Efficacy in preventing COVID-19 is UNKNOWN<\/h3>\n

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet<\/strong><\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that\u00a0may<\/strong>\u00a0prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine\u00a0may not<\/strong>\u00a0protect everyone.<\/p>\n

In an\u00a0ongoing clinical trial<\/strong>, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been shown to prevent COVID-19 following 2 doses given 3 weeks apart. The\u00a0duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that\u00a0may<\/strong>\u00a0prevent COVID-19.<\/p>\n

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine\u00a0may not<\/strong>\u00a0protect everyone.<\/p>\n

In an\u00a0ongoing clinical trial<\/strong>, the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine has been shown to prevent COVID-19 following 2 doses given 1 month apart. The\u00a0duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What Do Dissenting Doctors and Scientists Say About the Experimental, Non-FDA Approved COVID mRNA \u201cVaccines\u201d?<\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

When you purchase something online, do you read reviews of the product first, to find out what people say about that product, both positive and negative?<\/h3>\n

If you make a major purchase, such as purchasing a home or car, do you research all the positive and potential negative data that is available about this major purchase, prior to making a decision?<\/p>\n

Or do you just accept the marketing sales data about that product at face value without researching to see if their claims are accurate, including possibly searching to see if any complaints have been logged against the manufacturer.<\/p>\n

When dealing with a biological agent that is injected into your body with potential far-reaching effects on your health, would you not want to do the same thing, and to hear dissenting views as well as the \u201cmarketing sales data\u201d that Big Pharma is presenting?<\/p>\n

Not Allowed To Hear Dissenting Views<\/h3>\n

When it comes to vaccines in general, and the experimental mRNA COVID injections in particular, Big Pharma, the\u00a0 Government health agencies, and their corporate media outlets, do not believe that you have a right to hear dissenting views, because they believe they are the only a<\/span>uthority<\/span><\/span>\u00a0when it comes to matters of \u201cpublic health.\u201d<\/p>\n

As a result, those with dissenting views, which many times include whistle-blowers who used to work for Big Pharma, are heavily censored, and if the information gets out past their censorship, then those doctors and scientists are slandered and called \u201cquacks\u201d or \u201cfringe doctors,\u201d etc.<\/p>\n

Any product that cannot handle criticism to the point that significant finances and resources are spent trying to censor any negative information about those products, should raise red flags.<\/p>\n

The facts I am presenting here are the facts that highly credentialed and intelligent doctors and scientists do not believe that these experimental mRNA injections should be tested on the public.<\/p>\n

What they actually say is their opinion. But the doctors and scientists who work for the FDA, almost all of whom are financially connected to Big Pharma, also are offering their opinions when they recommend that a non-FDA approved biological injection should be given \u201cemergency use authorization\u201d due to a \u201cpandemic\u201d that is now over a year old, with no end in sight.<\/p>\n

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg<\/h3>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Dr. Sin Hang Lee is a pathologist and founder of\u00a0Milford Molecular Diagnostics<\/a><\/span><\/span>, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.<\/p>\n

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world\u2019s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.<\/p>\n

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even\u00a0sent a letter<\/a><\/span><\/span>, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.<\/p>\n

You can read his\u00a0March 22, 2020 letter here<\/a><\/span><\/span>. He explained that a two-phased test would \u201cguarantee no-false positive results\u201d based on his research and published work from Japan.<\/p>\n

He never received a response to his letter.<\/h3>\n

As 2020 was drawing to a close and it was well-known that the FDA was preparing to issue emergency use authorizations to Pfizer and Moderna for the experimental mRNA injections, Dr. Lee filed an\u00a0ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).<\/p>\n

The STAY OF ACTION was a\u00a0Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines<\/em><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The\u00a0STAY OF ACTION<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:<\/p>\n

\n

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all \u201cendpoints\u201d or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2\/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read the full Stay of Action here<\/a><\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n

The FDA never even replied to this filing, let alone have their attorneys try to defend their actions.<\/p>\n

Similar to Dr. Lee\u2019s Stay of Action filed with the FDA, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon filed an emergency\u00a0STAY OF ACTION<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0with the European Medicines Agency.<\/p>\n

This\u00a0STAY OF ACTION<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>was very similar to the one filed with the FDA in the U.S. by Dr. Sin Hang Lee, and demanded that clinical trials be STOPPED until there was an accurate testing mechanism in place to correctly identify SARS-CoV-2, since the PCR test is very inaccurate.<\/p>\n

Dr. Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, also went public in a viral video recording where he stated that the COVID Pandemic is over, and that it is being kept alive by false narratives using the faulty PCR tests. See:<\/p>\n

\u201cPandemic is Over\u201d \u2013 Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says \u201cSecond Wave\u201d Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n

In their\u00a0STAY OF ACTION<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0filed in Europe, one day BEFORE the U.K. issued emergency use authorization, Dr. Yeadon stated that this experimental vaccine can make females infertile.<\/p>\n

He writes that the Pfizer COVID vaccine as well as other COVID vaccines currently in Phase III trials are:<\/p>\n

\n

expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., \u201cResponse to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses\u201d \u2013 http:\/\/virological.org\/t\/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses\/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.<\/p>\n

There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.<\/p>\n

To my knowledge, Pfizer\/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.<\/p>\n

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer\/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).<\/p>\n

This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. (Source<\/a><\/span><\/span>.)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Dr. David Martin, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and others: These are NOT vaccines<\/h3>\n

Dr. David Martin, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and many other doctors and scientists claim that the mRNA experimental COVID injections do NOT meet the legal definition of a \u201cvaccine,\u201d and that the FDA is calling these injections \u201cvaccines\u201d to cover themselves legally.<\/p>\n

These are NOT fringe doctors and scientists. While I have never met Dr. Martin, I have known Dr. Tenpenny for more than a decade, and Dr. Mikovits for several years now, and have published much of their work here on\u00a0Health Impact News<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a doctor of Osteopathy, and one of the world\u2019s most articulate researchers when it comes to vaccines. She is a highly sought expert to speak on the issue, and a well-published author.<\/p>\n

Dr. Judy Mikovits has years of government research experience working directly with Dr. Anthony Fauci and others, and has suffered greatly in her life for blowing the whistle on government fraud in research. Along with Dr. David Martin, she was featured in the film produced by filmmaker Mikki Willis,\u00a0Plandemic<\/a>.<\/span><\/span> See:<\/p>\n

PLANDEMIC: Full Feature Film Released Online Amidst Tremendous Opposition and Attempts to Censor it<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n

In a recent 2-hour live stream event called \u201cFocus on Fauci,\u201d Dr. David Martin explained that the current experimental mRNA COVID injections are not vaccines, but medical devices.<\/p>\n

This is not a vaccine.<\/span><\/p>\n

We need to be really clear. We\u2019re using the term \u201cvaccine\u201d to sneak this thing under public health exemptions.<\/p>\n

This is not a vaccine. This is an mRNA packaged in a fat envelope, that is delivered to a cell.<\/p>\n

It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.<\/p>\n

It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term, and they\u2019re a legally defined term under public health law, they\u2019re legally defined term under the CDC and FDA standards.<\/p>\n

And a vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person who is receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission.<\/p>\n

And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell, it is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment.<\/p>\n

But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of the public health authorities, because then people would say, well what other treatments are there? (Full article<\/a><\/span><\/span>.)<\/p>\n

See also:<\/p>\n

The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body \u2013 Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n

Dr. Mikovits and Dr. Tenpenny have previously stated, prior to the FDA issuing EUAs for these experimental injections, that if these experimental \u201cvaccines\u201d were administered to the U.S. population, that there would be at least 50 million people murdered by lethal injection. See:<\/p>\n

Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S.<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n

Hundreds of Doctors Worldwide Warn Against the Experimental mRNA Injections<\/h3>\n

A large number of doctors from around the world came together to issue a dire warning about the experimental mRNA injections, and created a video where they all testified.<\/p>\n

Since publishing this video on Bitchute in \u00a0about 6 weeks, it has been viewed by over 375,000 people.<\/p>\n