{"id":4964,"date":"2020-09-10T11:52:15","date_gmt":"2020-09-10T10:52:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/?p=4964"},"modified":"2020-09-10T20:58:48","modified_gmt":"2020-09-10T19:58:48","slug":"the-covid-19-fear-campaign-has-no-scientific-basis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/index.php\/2020\/09\/10\/the-covid-19-fear-campaign-has-no-scientific-basis\/","title":{"rendered":"The Covid-19 Fear Campaign Has NO Scientific Basis"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has NO Scientific Basis<\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"

By Professor Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, September 02, 2020<\/p><\/div>\n

Closing down the Global Economy as a means to combating the Virus. That’s what they want us to believe. If the public had been informed that Covid-19 is \u201csimilar to Influenza\u201d, the fear campaign would have fallen flat . . .<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The data and concepts have been manipulated with a view to sustaining the fear campaign.<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
    \n
  1. The estimates are meaningless. The figures have been hyped to justify the lockdown and the closure of the national economy, with devastating economic and social consequences. The Virus is held responsible for poverty and mass unemployment.\u00a0<\/em><\/li>\n
  2. Confirmed by prominent\u00a0scientists as well as by official public health bodies including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Covid-19 <\/strong>is a public health concern but it is NOT a dangerous virus.<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n
  3. The COVID-19 crisis is\u00a0marked\u00a0by a public health \u201cemergency\u201d under WHO auspices which is being used as a pretext and a \u00a0justification to trigger a Worldwide process of economic, social and political restructuring.\u00a0<\/em>Social engineering is being applied. Governments are pressured into extending the lockdown, despite its devastating economic and social consequences.<\/em><\/li>\n
  4. There is no scientific basis for implementing the closing\u00a0down of the global economy as a means to resolving a public health crisis.\u00a0<\/i><\/li>\n
  5. Both the media and the governments are involved in spreading disinformation. <\/em><\/li>\n
  6. The fear campaign has no scientific basis.\u00a0<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Our objective is to reassure people Worldwide. Your governments are LYING. \u00a0In fact they are lying to themselves.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

    We start by defining the virus and the tests which are being used to \u201cidentify the virus\u201d.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

    1 \u00a0What is Covid-19, SARS-COV-2.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    Below is the official WHO definition of Covid-19:<\/p>\n

    Coronaviruses<\/strong> are a large family of viruses which may cause illness in animals or humans. \u00a0In humans, several coronaviruses are known to cause respiratory infections ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The most recently discovered coronavirus causes coronavirus disease COVID-19.<\/p>\n

    The most common symptoms of COVID-19<\/strong> are fever, dry cough, and tiredness. \u2026 These symptoms are usually mild and begin gradually. Some people become infected but only have very mild symptoms<\/strong>.\u00a0Most people (about 80%) recover from the disease without needing hospital treatment. Around 1 out of every 5 people who gets COVID-19 becomes seriously ill and develops difficulty breathing.<\/p>\n

    \u201cCOVID-19 is similar to SARS-1\u2033: According to<\/span> <\/a><\/span>\u00a0Dr. Wolfgang\u00a0Wodarg,\u00a0<\/strong>pneumonia is \u201cregularly caused or accompanied by corona viruses\u201d.\u00a0Immunologists broadly confirm the CDC definition. COVID-19 has similar features to a seasonal influenza coupled with pneumonia.<\/p>\n

    According to Anthony Fauci<\/strong> (Head of NIAID), H. Clifford Lane<\/strong> and Robert R. Redfield<\/strong> (Head of CDC) in the New England Journal of Medicine\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u2026the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza<\/strong> (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.<\/p>\n

    Dr. Anthony Fauci<\/strong>\u00a0 is lying to himself. In his public statements he says that Covid is \u201cTen Times Worse than Seasonal Flu\u201d.<\/p>\n

    He\u00a0refutes his peer reviewed report quoted above.\u00a0From the outset, Fauci has been\u00a0instrumental in waging the fear and panic campaign across America:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

    Covid-19 versus Influenza (Flu) Virus A and Virus B (and subtypes)<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    Rarely mentioned by the media or the governments, The CDC confirms that Covid-19 is similar to Influenza<\/a><\/span><\/span>:<\/p>\n

    \n

    \u201cInfluenza (Flu) and COVID-19 are both contagious respiratory illnesses, but they are caused by different viruses<\/strong>. COVID-19 is caused by infection with a new coronavirus (called SARS-CoV-2) and flu is caused by infection with influenza viruses<\/a><\/span><\/span>. Because some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, it may be hard to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone, and testing may be needed to help confirm a diagnosis. Flu and COVID-19 share many characteristics, but there are some key differences between the two.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    If the public had been informed and reassured that Covid\u00a0is \u201csimilar to Influenza\u201d, the fear campaign would have fallen flat.<\/p>\n

    The lockdown and closure of the national economy would have been rejected outright.<\/p>\n

    2. The Test for Covid-19 \u201cConfirmed Cases\u201d<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    The standard Covid test \u00a0is the\u00a0Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR<\/strong>):<\/p>\n

    \n

    The COVID-19 RT-PCR test is a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper and lower respiratory specimens \u2026 collected from individuals suspected of COVID 19 \u2026 [as well as] from individuals without symptoms or other reasons to suspect COVID-19 infection. \u2026<\/p>\n

    This test is also for use with individual nasal swab specimens that are self-collected using the Pixel by LabCorp COVID-19 test home collection kit \u2026\u00a0The COVID-19 RT-PCR test is also for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from the SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples, using a matrix pooling strategy (FDA,\u00a0LabCorp Laboratory Test Number: 139900)<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    First, it should be understood that the Covid-19 \u00a0RT-PCR Test is similar to that used in relation to Influenza. This test is based on upper and lower respiratory specimens.<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/strong>The criteria and guidelines confirmed by the CDC <\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0pertaining to \u201cThe CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Diagnostic Panel\u201d are as follows (Read carefully):<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    Results are for the identification of 2019-nCoV RNA. The 2019-nCoV RNA<\/strong> is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.<\/strong> Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    Negative results do not preclude 2019-nCoV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions<\/strong>. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    What this suggests is that a positive infection<\/strong> could be the result of other viruses\u00a0as well as other corona viruses.\u00a0<\/strong>(i.e. related to seasonal influenza or pneumonia).<\/p>\n

    And, according to the CDC it \u00a0\u201cdoes not rule out \u201cbacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.\u201d (CDC)<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The following diagram<\/a><\/span><\/span> summarizes the process of identifying positive and negative cases: All that is required is the presence of \u201cviral genetic material\u201d for it to be categorised as \u201cpositive\u201d. The procedure does not identity or isolate Covid-19. What appears in the tests are fragments of the virus<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      \n
    1. A positive test does not mean that you have the virus and\/or that you could transmit the virus.<\/li>\n
    2. A negative test does not mean that you do not have it.<\/li>\n
    3. What the governments want is to inflate the number of positive cases.\u00a0<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      While SARS-CoV-2<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013namely the the virus which is said to cause COVID-19 (erroneously categorized as a disease rather than a virus), was isolated in a laboratory test in January 2020, the RT-PCR <\/strong>test does not identify\/detect the Covid-19 virus. What it detects are fragments of the virus<\/strong>.\u00a0According to renowned Swiss immunologist Dr B. Stadler<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
      \n

      So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected<\/strong>, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.<\/strong> Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      Bear in mind: Because the RT-PCR test is similar to the test used in the case of \u00a0influenza (flu) (i.e. coronavirus A,B, C, D), a positive test does not mean that you test positive for Covid-19.<\/p>\n

      The Question is Positive for What?? The PCR does not detect the identity of the virus, According to Dr. Pascal Sacr\u00e9<\/span><\/span>, <\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

      \n

      these tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.<\/strong><\/p>\n

      In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to errors, sterility errors and contamination<\/p>\n

      Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease!<\/span><\/h4>\n

      PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient\u2019s state of health to confirm its value [reliability]<\/p>\n

      The media frighten everyone with new positive PCR tests, without any nuance or context, wrongly assimilating this information with a second wave of COVID-19.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Presumptive vs. Confirmed Cases<\/strong><\/h2>\n

      In the US, the CDC data <\/span>include both \u201cconfirmed\u201d and \u201cpresumptive\u201d positive cases<\/strong> of COVID-19 reported to CDC or tested at CDC since January 21, 2020\u2033.<\/p>\n

      The presumptive positive data does not confirm coronavirus infection:\u00a0Presumptive testing involves \u201cchemical analysis of a sample<\/strong> that establishes the possibility that a substance is present<\/strong>\u201c (emphasis added). The presumptive test must then be sent for confirmation to an accredited government health lab. (For further details see: Michel Chossudovsky,\u00a0Spinning Fear and Panic Across America. Analysis of COVID-19 Data<\/a><\/span><\/span>,\u00a0<\/strong>March 20, 2020)<\/em><\/p>\n

      Similarly in Canada,\u00a0\u201cA point-of-care test\u201d<\/strong> is a \u201crapid test done at the time and place of care, such as a hospital or doctor\u2019s office\u201d. It consists in collecting \u201csamples from the nose or throat using swabs\u201d, which are then tested on site, with almost immediate results (in 30 to 60 minutes).\u00a0But it does not confirm the presence of COVID-19.<\/p>\n

      Serological testing or Antibody Tests for COVID-19 \u00a0<\/b><\/strong><\/h4>\n

      According to the CDC, Serological tests do not detect the virus itself, \u201cthey detect the antibodies produced in response to an infection. Serological tests are not used for \u201cearly diagnosis of COVID-19.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

      How is the COVID-19 Data Tabulated?<\/strong><\/h4>\n

      Below is a screen shot of the CDC form<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0entitled Human Infection with 2019 Novel Coronavirus Case Report Form <\/strong>to be filled in by authorised medical\/ health personnel<\/p>\n

      Note the categorisation of probable cases, bearing in mind that the lab confirmed case is misleading. No way to identify the covi-19 virus in a PCR lab test<\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

      In the US, the probable (PC) and the lab confirmed cases (CC) are lumped together. And the total number (PC + CC ) constitutes the basis for establishing the data for COVID-19 infection. It\u2019s like adding apples and oranges.<\/p>\n

      The total figure (PC+CC) categorised as \u201cTotal cases\u201d<\/strong> is meaningless. It does not measure positive COVID-19 Infection.<\/p>\n

      Most of the presumptive tests are undertaken by private clinics or commercial clinics.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      In the UK, according to a\u00a0Daily Telegraph May 21 report<\/span><\/span>:<\/a>\u00a0\u201csamples taken from the same patient are being recorded as two separate tests in the Government\u2019s official figures\u201d.<\/p>\n

      This is only one example of data manipulation. In the US, clinics are paid ($$$) to hike up the number of Covid-19 admissions. A probable case does not require a lab exam: \u201cMeets vital records criteria with no confirmatory lab testing\u201d (see form above)<\/p>\n

      COVID-19 Recovery Rates<\/strong><\/h4>\n

      The CDC\u00a0Data tabulates \u00a0both \u201cconfirmed\u201d and \u201cpresumptive\u201d positive cases since January 21, 2020.\u00a0Yet what it fails to make public is that among the confirmed and presumptive cases,\u00a0a large number of Americans have recovered. But nobody talks about recovery. It does not make the headlines.<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Falsification of Death Certificates<\/strong><\/h4>\n

      At the outset of the pandemic, the CDC had been instructed to change the methodology regarding Death Certificates with a view to artificially inflating the numbers of \u201cCovid deaths\u201d. \u00a0According to\u00a0H. Ealy, M. McEvoy et al<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

      \u201cThe\u00a02003 guidelines\u00a0for establishing death certificates had been cancelled. \u201cHad the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners\u2019 and Coroners\u2019 Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003,<\/em> as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2%<\/strong> lower \u00a0than it currently is.\u201d (Covid-19: Questionable Policies, Manipulated Rules of Data Collection and Reporting. Is It Safe for Students to Return to School<\/span><\/span>?<\/a>\u00a0By H.<\/span> Ealy<\/span><\/span><\/a>, M. McEvoy<\/a><\/span><\/span>, and et al.<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> August 09, 2020<\/em><\/p>\n

      The latest CDC report confirms that 94% of the deaths attributed to Covid have \u201ccomorbidities\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/span>,(i.e. deaths dues other causes).<\/p>\n

      For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

      On March 21, 2020 the following specific guidelines were introduced by the CDC<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u00a0regarding Death Certificates (and their tabulation in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS)<\/p>\n

      \n
      \n
      \n

      A New ICD code was introduced for COVID-19 deaths:\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

      Will\u00a0\u00a0COVID-19 be the underlying cause of death<\/span><\/span>?<\/a>\u00a0 <\/strong>This concept is fundamental.\u00a0The underlying cause of death\u00a0<\/strong>is defined by the WHO as \u201cthe disease or injury that initiated the train of events leading directly to death\u201d. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

      What the CDC is recommending with regards to statistical coding and categorisation is that COVID-19 is expected to \u00a0be the underlying cause of death \u201cmore often than not.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

      (see below):<\/p>\n

      Will COVID-19 be the underlying cause of death<\/span><\/span>?<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      What happens if certifiers report terms other than the suggested terms?<\/p>\n

      If a death certificate reports coronavirus without identifying a specific strain or explicitly specifying that it is not COVID-19, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify whether or not the coronavirus was COVID-19. <\/strong><\/p>\n

      As long as the phrase used indicates the 2019 coronavirus strain, NCHS expects to assign the new code.<\/strong> However, it is preferable and more straightforward for certifiers to use the standard terminology (COVID-19).<\/p>\n

      What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate uncertainty?<\/strong><\/p>\n

      If the death certificate reports terms such as \u201cprobable COVID-19\u201d or \u201clikely COVID-19,\u201d these terms would be assigned the new ICD code<\/strong>. It Is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.<\/p>\n

      If \u00a0\u201cpending COVID-19 testing\u201d<\/strong> is reported on the death certificate, this would be considered a pending record.\u00a0In this scenario, NCHS would expect to receive an updated record, since the code will likely result in R99.\u00a0In this case, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify if test results confirmed that the decedent had COVID- 19.<\/p>\n

      \u2026 COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.<\/strong> Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      These specific guidelines have indelibly contributed to increasing Covid-19 as the recorded \u201ccause of death\u201d.<\/p>\n

      And this despite the fact that the relevant lab texts (i.e. RT PCR) provide misleading results. Bear in mind that a Covid-19 cause of death does not require a lab exam.<\/p>\n

      \n
      \n
      \n

      Summary<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n