{"id":4340,"date":"2020-07-23T14:28:27","date_gmt":"2020-07-23T13:28:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/?p=4340"},"modified":"2020-07-23T14:28:27","modified_gmt":"2020-07-23T13:28:27","slug":"dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/index.php\/2020\/07\/23\/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr. Stefan Lanka 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Virus Misconception<\/h1>\n

This is at the heart of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, most people would not buy the NWO-directed official narrative of COVID propaganda<\/strong>. In a previous article on the nature of the virus<\/a><\/span><\/span>, I have discussed the heroic efforts of German virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka,<\/span><\/strong> who won a landmark case in 2017 which went all the way to the German Supreme Court. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, and that there was in fact no such thing as a measles virus.<\/strong> <\/span>Lanka is still busy working, and he wrote this paper earlier this year (translated into English) entitled \u201c\u201cThe Misconception called Virus\u201d\u201d<\/em> in which he explains the history of how mainstream science went horribly wrong with its conclusions (really assumptions) to demonise the humble virus and to falsely ascribe pathogenicity to it when there is none.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\nPaper-Virus-Lanka-002<\/a>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Virus Misconception: The Killer Virus Story vs. Deficiency and Toxicity<\/h2>\n

Lanka\u2019s main point throughout the article is this: when modern scientists are working with diseased tissue, they think the presence of a virus is causing the disease, instead of realising that the tissue in question has been cut off and isolated from its host, then doused with antibiotics, and that this separation and poison make it diseased and kill it, rather than any virus. Lanka writes:<\/p>\n

\u201cAll claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations \u2026 All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201d \u2026 the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no \u201cinfected\u201d genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to \u2026 scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called \u201cvirus propagation\u201d \u2026 scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances \u2026 to the cell culture.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThese control experiment have never been carried out by the official\u00a0 \u201cscience\u201d to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged \u201cinfected\u201d material.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In other words, the studied cells and tissues die with or without the presence of a virus in exactly the same way; therefore, the virus cannot be the cause of the morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, this exactly what many health experts have stated, namely that there are only 2 causes of disease: deficiency and toxicity<\/strong>. For instance, Charlotte Gerson (who took over running the Gerson Clinic from her brilliant father Max) said this about disease and cancer. Removing cells or tissue from the body and thus cutting them off from their energy\/nutrient supply will quickly lead to deficiency; injecting antibiotics into the mixture is toxicity; thus there is no solid proof a virus is causing disease when there is already deficiency and toxicity present. This is the key point of the virus misconception.<\/p>\n

How The Virus Misconception Has Roots in 1858 and Became Entrenched in 1954<\/h2>\n

Lanka traces back the development of the virus misconception<\/strong> to 1858 and to the \u2018cell theory\u2019 of Rudolf Virchow, who proposed a theory that all disease and all life originates from a single cell, which is somehow hijacked by a virus that weakens it and propagates itself. Lanka points out 2 problems with this:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe cell theory was only originated because Rudolf Virchow suppressed crucial discoveries about tissues. The findings and insights with respect to the structure, function and central importance of tissues in the creation of life, which were already known in 1858, comprehensively refute the cell theory and the subsequently derived genetic, immune and cancer therapies.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThe infection theories were only established as a global dogma through the concrete policies and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict this theory; after 1933, these critical scientists were silenced.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

By \u201cinfection theories\u201d Lanka means germ theory<\/strong>, the prevailing theory of modern Western Medicine. Lanka then describes how a paradigm shift in the perception of the virus occurred during 1952-1954:<\/p>\n

\u201cUntil 1952, a virus was defined as a pathogenic poison in the form of a protein, which as an enzyme caused damage in an unknown manner, which could cause disease and be transmissible. After 1953, the year in which the alleged DNA in the form [of] an alleged alpha helix was publicly announced, the idea of a virus became a malignant geno-type wrapped in proteins. Thus, a paradigm shift took place between 1952 and 1954 regarding the image of a virus.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

He talks about how theory become dogma in the Church of Mainstream Science (aka Scientism):<\/p>\n

\n