{"id":11111,"date":"2022-06-18T10:46:29","date_gmt":"2022-06-18T09:46:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/?p=11111"},"modified":"2022-06-18T10:46:29","modified_gmt":"2022-06-18T09:46:29","slug":"now-to-learn-the-facts-about-monkeypox","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biggeesblog.cymru\/index.php\/2022\/06\/18\/now-to-learn-the-facts-about-monkeypox\/","title":{"rendered":"Now To Learn The FACTS About MONKEYPOX"},"content":{"rendered":"

Background<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

Following on from a recent post on BGB, headed:\u00a0\u201cFool Me Once \u2013 SHAME On YOU \u2013 Fool Me Twice \u2013 SHAME On ME!\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Below is a reproduced article by BGB, with minor edits and format changes – the contents are exactly as originally written by Dr. Sam Bailey<\/a><\/span><\/span>. It goes through the historical background of the rare<\/em> Monkeypox disease. SARS-Cov-2 was promoted as a novel<\/em> virus; this time the fear porn revolves around the rare<\/em> Monkeypox disease. It is all part of the same fear generating technique to again put people in a state of hysteria and fear about another impending\u00a0 hoax pandemic (two in under three years? Pull the other one). However why change the formula if the first version of a hoax pandemic worked so well? I doubt if it will work so well this time – but you can guarantee that the ignorant, medically undereducated and more gullible amongst us will – sadly – fall for it.<\/p>\n

As with the first false pandemic (Covid-19) when it comes to Monkeypox, the real goal is to inject as many people as possible with a toxic mRNA jab, laced with graphene oxide and other deadly particles. Whether this Monkeypox inoculation programme will contain the same substances as the Covid injection remains to be seen. Whatever it may be, it will be deadly by design, causing illness and death. That is the intention that has been exposed widely in ‘their’ first injection experiment on humans with the Covid-19 jabs – millions have been deceived through lies and false science, particularly the biggest lie of all – that viruses exist and cause disease – born from a fraudulent germ theory hatched by an incompetent, plagiaristic and below par chemist, whose real talent was self promotion\u00a0 and\u00a0 fraudulent scientific practices to gain the ear of influential people – his name? Louis Pasteur<\/a><\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

Dr. Sam Bailey – A Short Biography:<\/h4>\n

She completed her medical training at the University of Otago, gaining a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MB ChB). As a resident doctor she worked in all areas of medicine, with a particular focus on Emergency Medicine and Cardiology. Following this, she worked in General Practice and Sexual Health before becoming a Clinical Trials Research Physician. Over that decade, she worked as a supervising doctor in phase I-IV clinical trials.<\/span><\/p>\n

In 2017, Sam founded award-winning medical company SwiftMed, New Zealand\u2019s first nationwide primary care online doctor consultation service. The service was an instant success with almost exclusive 5 star ratings. SwiftMed was awarded the Emerging Business award at the 2018 Westpac Champion Business Awards, the largest and most prestigious regional awards ceremony in New Zealand.<\/span><\/p>\n

She subsequently became a television presenter for \u201cThe CheckUp\u201d \u2013 a nationwide New Zealand health show that debunks common health misconceptions. This inspired Sam to start her own YouTube channel in late 2019, questioning the scientific evidence of mainstream health narratives and answering questions from her viewers.<\/span><\/p>\n

In early 2020, with the arrival of Covid-19, Sam began researching the scientific evidence behind lockdowns, social distancing and PCR tests. After releasing a YouTube video in September, where she stated she would not take a coronavirus vaccine, she was sacked halfway through filming a second series of \u201cThe CheckUp\u201d. Subsequently, she lost some of her employment as a medical doctor and has had ongoing legal battles with the New Zealand medical authorities who are attempting to silence her views on Covid-19.<\/span><\/p>\n

Sam is a co-author of the number 1 best seller in Amazon Microbiology Science: \u2018Virus Mania\u2019 which examines how the medical industry continually invents epidemics to make billion-dollar profits at our expense.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/div>\n
\n

False Pandemics Round Two.<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
Written by Content creator, medical author & health educator – Dr. Sam Bailey.<\/span><\/em><\/div>\n
\u00a0–<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cMonkeypox\u201d \u2013 who could have seen it coming? Well, apparently the organisation founded by Ted Turner in 2001 called the \u2018Nuclear Threat Initiative\u2019 (NTI) saw it coming when they published a report in November 2021 called, \u201cStrengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats<\/a><\/span><\/span>.\u201d The report states that in March 2021, they partnered with the Munich Security Conference to run an exercise scenario involving a, \u201cdeadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months\u2026the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.\u201d<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

\"\"

The Nuclear Threat Initiative introduces Plandemic 2.0? This time it is even bigger and monkeypox takes centre stage.<\/p><\/div><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Amazingly, the scenario had the monkeypox outbreak emerging as a result of an act of bioterrorism in May 2022, right where we are now. We have dealt with\u00a0gain of function garbage<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0involving non-existent viruses in several other\u00a0videos<\/a><\/span><\/span>, while Dr Stefan Lanka has also\u00a0dismantled<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0such fallacies. Regardless, the NTI\u2019s report suggests that what is required in a fantasy outbreak is, \u201caggressive measures to slow virus transmission by shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates.\u201d The winning countries in the NTI\u2019s hallucination implemented, \u201clarge-scale testing and contact-tracing operations and scaled-up their health care systems.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"

\u201cBut, I haven\u2019t got any viruses Peter.\u201d<\/p><\/div>\n

Their charts, which seem to be produced by Neil Ferguson\u2019s calculator, show that countries that don\u2019t comply with their restrictions and medical interventions will be far worse off. The report goes on to state, \u201cboth the exercise scenario and the COVID-19 response demonstrate that early actions by national governments have significant, positive impacts in managing the impact of the disease.\u201d When they say \u201cpositive impacts\u201d it is not quite clear who is on the receiving end, although they note that \u201cthe COVID vaccine market will exceed $150 billion in 2021.\u201d All in all the NTI\u2019s report reads like Event 201 on Ritalin. (Event 201 took place on 18 October, 2019. It was an exercise involving a, \u201ccoronavirus pandemic\u201d just months before the COVID-19 \u201cpandemic\u201d was declared.)<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"\"<\/a>

Monkeypox attacks right on cue!<\/p><\/div>

<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

As with COVID-19 it appears that other parties have also been eagerly awaiting a market such a \u201cpandemic\u201d would present. Likewise, these fortune-tellers were preparing vaccines to go where no vaccine had gone before. In this case the biotech company Bavarian Nordic gained approval from the FDA in 2019 to market\u00a0JYNNEOS<\/a><\/span><\/span>, a smallpox and monkeypox vaccine. Other health authorities were also primed to react to a previously rare condition that has been of no concern for their nations\u2026until now apparently. For example, on May 20, 2022, the UK Health Security Agency published a\u00a0document<\/a><\/span><\/span> titled, \u201cRecommendations for the use of pre and post exposure vaccination during a monkeypox incident.\u201d Like COVID-19, it\u2019s starting to feel like all roads lead to vaccines again . . .<\/p>\n

\"\"

Just a matter of time before the \u201crare\u201d monkeypox vaccine comes to your neighbourhood.<\/p><\/div>\n

So now that the scene has been set we can get into the \u201cscience\u201d of monkeypox starting with an official description of the alleged viral disease. The CDC states that, \u201cMonkeypox was first discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in colonies of monkeys kept for research, hence the name \u2018monkeypox.\u2019 The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo.\u201d They go on to state that, \u201cin humans, the symptoms of monkeypox are similar to but milder than the symptoms of smallpox.\u201d The illness is said to be flu-like with the addition of lymph node swelling and then development of a rash, and then lesions that progress from macules to vesicles to scabs.<\/p>\n

In terms of the lethality of monkeypox, the CDC state that, \u201cin Africa, monkeypox has been shown to cause death in as many as 1 in 10 persons who contract the disease.\u201d This 10% fatality rate has already stoked the fear narrative and was also used as the case fatality rate in the NTI\u2019s monkeypox pipe dream. It should be noted that historically monkeypox has been virtually unheard of in first world countries and the rare cases are usually in people that have recently arrived from Africa.<\/p>\n

Indeed, one of the only recorded \u201coutbreaks\u201d of monkeypox in the first world was in the United States in April 2003. Cases were\u00a0declared in 6 states<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0and said to be caused by rodents that were imported to Texas from Ghana. This was the first time monkeypox had been reported outside of Africa and the CDC published a\u00a0paper<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0in 2006 analysing the incident. The paper states that, \u201cperson-to-person spread of the virus is\u00a0thought<\/em>\u00a0to occur principally via infectious oropharyngeal exudates\u201d although it is clear that this has never been scientifically established. They continue to say that, \u201cthe virus is\u00a0thought\u00a0<\/em>to have been transmitted from African animals\u201d \u2013 in other words, it\u2019s another species-jumping pathogen tale.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"\"

Blaming it on minority groups, when have we seen that before?<\/p><\/div>

<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

They reported that, \u201cindividuals who had illness onset within 21 days after exposure to MPXV [Monkeypox virus] who experienced fever (defined as a body temperature greater 37.4\u00b0C) and vesicular pustular rash or rash (potentially uncharacterized) plus orthopox IgM antibodies were classified as having probable cases of infection.\u201d Now 37.4\u00b0C is not a fever in our book, it is a normal body temperature and we would suggest 37.6\u00b0C and above qualifies as a fever. We noted in their chart that they were using the classification \u226539.4\u00b0C, but this appears to be an error as in another paper, we\u2019ll get to soon, it was once again 37.4\u00b0C. The second paper even said the \u201cfever\u201d could be subjective, so they appear to be using this loose criteria and pathologising a normal state. Additionally, the CDC\u2019s\u00a0weekly report<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0from the 11th of July 2003, stated that from a total of 71 cases, only \u201ctwo patients, both children, had serious clinical illness; both of these patients have recovered.\u201d The remainder had a variety of respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms.<\/p>\n

The CDC\u2019s cases were confirmed on the basis of specimens that showed, \u201cmonkeypox virus isolation, detection of monkeypox-specific nucleic acid signatures, positive electron-microscopy findings, or positive immunohistochemical findings.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0We had a look at the electron micrographs presented by the CDC including the\u00a0image<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0shown below of a skin sample from one of the patients. The caption informs us that the round particles on the right are immature monkeypox virions, while the oval particles on the left are mature viruses. However, all they have is a static image of dead tissue and no conclusions can be made about the biological role of the imaged particles. None of them have been shown to be replication-competent disease-causing intracellular parasites and so should not be called \u2018viruses\u2019.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"\"<\/a>

The oldest trick in the book: Image some vesicles and call them \u201cviruses\u201d. To see why this is insufficient watch\u00a0Electron Microscopy and Unidentified \u201cViral\u201d Objects. CLICK ON THE IMAGE<\/p><\/div>

<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Looking at the CDC\u2019s weekly report from 2003 again, it appears that the 35\u00a0\u201claboratory-confirmed cases\u201d all involved polymerase chain reaction (PCR) \u201ctests\u201d, so we investigated the scientific evidence behind this claim. One of the citations for the development of PCR detection of monkeypox is a 2004\u00a0paper<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0titled \u201cReal-Time PCR System for Detection of Orthopoxviruses and Simultaneous Identification of Smallpox Virus.\u201d Now a PCR protocol requires them to know the genetic sequences of the alleged monkeypox virus, which takes us to this 2001\u00a0paper<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0titled, \u201cHuman monkeypox and smallpox viruses: genomic comparison\u201d. The paper claimed to have \u201cisolated\u201d the monkeypox virus in a rhesus monkey kidney cell culture from a scab of a monkeypox patient. Here the virologists are up to their old tricks again by asserting that: (a) the patient\u2019s scab contains the monkeypox virus, and (b) it is now in their culture brew. They claimed to have sequenced the \u201cviral genome\u201d by referring to a process described for sequencing an alleged variola virus in 1993.<\/p>\n

But when we look at this\u00a0paper<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0there is no virus demonstrated either, simply an assertion that it was \u201cisolated\u201d from, \u201cthe material from a patient from India\u201d in 1967. They go on to make the claim that, \u201cthe virions were purified by differential centrifugation and viral DNA was isolated\u201d \u2013 however, there is no demonstration of what they purified or how they were determined to be virions. In none of these experiments did they perform any controls by seeing what sequences can be detected from other human-derived scabs or similar specimens from unwell individuals. This is where we need to remind the virologists of what a virus is supposed to be \u2013 that is, a replication-competent intracellular parasite that infects and causes disease in a host. It is not detecting genetic sequences contained within scabs and claiming that they belong to a virus.<\/p>\n

So returning to the CDC\u2019s paper describing the 2003 \u201coutbreak\u201d, it is unclear how they established they could be diagnosing anyone with monkeypox by using the PCR. Their PCR can only have been calibrated to sequences of unproven provenance. Additionally, it doesn\u2019t matter what kind of analytical specificity their PCR protocol had, there was no established diagnostic specificity \u2013 in other words it was not a clinically-validated test, an issue that goes beyond whether the \u201cvirus\u201d exists or not. (From the\u00a0MIQE Guidelines<\/a><\/span><\/span>:\u00a0Analytical specificity<\/em>\u00a0refers to the qPCR assay detecting the appropriate target sequence rather than other, nonspecific targets also present in a sample.\u00a0Diagnostic specificity<\/em>\u00a0is the percentage of individuals without a given condition whom the assay identifies as negative for that condition.)<\/p>\n

The 47 US cases they ended up describing were all in some sort of contact with imported African prairie dogs and the CDC\u2019s paper concludes that, \u201cindividuals contracted MPXV infections from infected prairie dogs; no human-to-human transmission was documented, but there were many different potential scenarios of infection involving respiratory and\/or muco-cutaneous exposures, percutaneous and\/or inoculation exposures.\u201d Now there were some problems with the study design which they admitted to including that, \u201cthe analyses were limited by incomplete reporting or recall of information by patients. And, because of the retrospective nature of the study, we were unable to obtain highly detailed data.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, even allowing some wriggle room for them here, the inconsistencies go further still. Firstly, no one in the US incident died from the disease which is said to have a 10% fatality rate in Africa. No doubt, the inconsistent lethality rates will be attributed to different \u201cvariants\u201d, but there can\u2019t be variants of something that doesn\u2019t exist.<\/p>\n

There were few images available of the skin lesions that were reported in the 2003 incident but two of the US cases are depicted below and an image from a monkeypox case in Africa is shown for comparison. The reader can make up their own mind but those skin reactions do not look remotely comparable to us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

\"\"

African child with monkeypox<\/p><\/div><\/td>\n

\n

\"\"

US child with monkeypox<\/p><\/div><\/td>\n

\n

\"\"

US man with monkeypox<\/p><\/div><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n<\/figcaption>Next, the CDC claim<\/a><\/span><\/span> that, \u201cthe natural reservoir of monkeypox remains unknown. However, African rodents and non-human primates (like monkeys) may harbor the virus and infect people\u201d \u2013 in other words it\u2019s all rather vague and remains an unproven hypothesis. Now, obviously some people became unwell in the US in 2003 but with the viral theory we are supposed to believe that it jumped from some prairie dogs to some humans and the latter became infected with the alleged virus\u2026but then no human could pass it on to another human. The theory falls flat \u2013 a virus needs to spread, if it can\u2019t spread, it\u2019s dead and thus it\u2019s not a virus. And the historical patterns of alleged monkeypox virus outbreaks make no sense \u2013 why did it pass to these people so easily and yet it can go a decade between alleged \u201coutbreaks\u201d?<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the 2003 incident was investigated as though the viral contagion theory had already been established and other explanations were ignored. If people were allegedly getting sick from these African rodents, wouldn\u2019t it be a good idea to check the animals for other toxicities, particularly in their faeces and also for any ticks or parasites? We did note another reference<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0state that with regards to the US cases, \u201cmany of the people had initial and satellite lesions on palms, soles, and extremities.\u201d However, according to the CDC, monkeypox usually starts on the face so the clinical picture in the US cases was not consistent with cases that are typically described in Africa.<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

In any case, a review of the scientific evidence revealed that with regards to monkeypox:<\/p>\n

(a) there is no evidence of a physical particle that meets the definition of a virus,<\/span><\/p>\n

(b) there is no evidence of anything transmitting between humans, and<\/span><\/p>\n

(c) there is no way to confirm a diagnosis of monkeypox – unless you believe in clinically-unvalidated tests such as the PCR kits that have been produced. In other words, if we see a monkeypox \u201cpandemic\u201d that is used as an excuse to role out more globalist terrorism, it will be on the back of another<\/span> PCR pandemic<\/a><\/span><\/span>, not one that has any basis in nature.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

For those of you wanting to explore more problems with the various monkeypox claims, Mike Stone of ViroLIEgy has written a couple of interesting commentaries. The first\u00a0article<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0is, \u201cWas Smallpox Really\u00a0Eradicated?\u201d, which among other things deals with the convenient emergence of monkeypox while smallpox was apparently being eradicated. The second\u00a0article<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0is, \u201cDid William Heberden Distinguish Chickenpox From Smallpox in\u00a01767?\u201d This outlines the fact that the pox conditions are not as readily distinguishable from each other as the text books suggest and appear to relate more to the severity of a similar disease process. You can also watch our\u00a0video<\/a><\/span><\/span>,\u00a0\u201cChickenpox Parties and Varicella Zoster Virus?\u201d to see why there is no evidence of a virus in that related condition either.<\/p>\n

From the perspective of terrain theory it is a fundamental mistake to attribute a person\u2019s illness to a supposed virus, as the subsequent \u201ctreatments\u201d don\u2019t address the underlying issues. If someone is unwell, then they are usually deficient in nutrients and need to restore balance, or they have been exposed to environmental toxins and need to help the body detoxify. Wars against alleged pathogens that involve treating everyone the same way with civil rights restrictions and vaccines are certainly not about health. It is good to see more people waking up to the\u00a0COVID-19 fraud<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0so there is hope that a monkeypox scamdemic, if attempted, will bring even more light to the situation. As always, your best health is in your own hands, not in the hands of a globalist cult and their cronies.<\/p>\n

If you have been outsourcing your health, there has never been a better time to free yourself from the virus fear narrative and begin manifesting your full potential instead.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n

View all of BGB’s videos by visiting the BGB archive channels at:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

|<\/span> \"\"<\/a> |<\/span> \"\"<\/a> |<\/span> \"\"<\/a> |<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n

\n

SUBSCRIBE for free to receive automated notifications of new posts from BGB in your e-mail inbox – as they’re published. You can unsubscribe at any time you choose.<\/strong><\/em><\/span>

Please enter your details below and click 'Subscribe'<\/div>

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span>Bookmark<\/span><\/a>
Please login to bookmark<\/span>\n<\/line><\/line><\/svg><\/i>Close<\/i><\/a><\/div>
\n