An In Depth Look At Graphene & Graphene Oxide
But first, I’d like to demonstrate the creative talents of my ‘Wing Man’ here at BGB! He’s the extremely hard working Correspondence Journal editor – Wynne Jones.
Words to the accompaniment of the famous Dolly Parton tune ‘Jolene’.
“Graphene”Graphene, Graphene, Toxicity beyond compare He talks about you in his sleep And I can easily understand You could have your choice of men I had to have this talk with you |
If there are any budding recording artists out there – feel free – we don’t charge for copyright!
Right, enough of the frivolities (although you have to keep a light heart in these troubled times) – down to business:
In Depth Information On The Use Of Graphene
This is a follow-up to the last BGB published post, where we introduced the horrific discovery that the Pfizer so-called ‘vaccine‘ may be little more that a graphene oxide jab, with a tiny amount of mRNA material included in it. We also learned a little about the toxicity of graphene oxide in the body – especially when injected. The other methods of delivery, albeit in smaller quantities, are via contaminated nasal swabs and masks, so are slightly less of a worry – but still very important. They seem to be a delivery method that helped buoy up the illusion that a circulating virus was causing the symptoms of illness; and then the truly frightening prospect that graphene may be used in the future filtration of our drinking water in the UK. Some people have also suggested that graphene may also have been deployed in the well documented ‘chem-trails’ mystery that we have seen proliferate in latter years. We are still investigating those claims, but at face value they certainly seem to fit the picture of what is going on. It should be noted that the Spanish research team have only – to date – published an interim study paper; as and when a final peer reviewed paper is published, we have to be patient, so we eagerly await that – in order to nail down their research results. However, having done all the research work available to us at present, it appears quite conclusive to BGB that there is no smoke without fire. The jigsaw puzzle pieces seem to fit perfectly.
The big revelation however is that graphene poisoning exactly mirrors the symptoms we have been led to believe are associated with SARS Cov-2 (Covid-19 infection). It is now pretty much understood by the more alert and critically minded (including respected and world renowned experts in the medical and scientific fields), that the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’ is nothing but a hoax, and many millions refute the very existence of a novel virus – or any virus for that matter, if you follow up on terrain theory as opposed to Pasteurian germ theory). SARS Cov 2 has not been separated, isolated or identified. Nowhere in the world does laboratory evidence exist that a separated, identified and properly genome sequenced virus (without the aid of computer modelling) actually exists. There is only anecdotal documentation to suggest that the virus has been properly identified. That is hypothetical, with no hard evidence to suggest it’s existence or to corroborate the documentation that it does exist. It could well be, that graphene oxide toxification of humans (by a number of means) may have been conveniently used to mimic the symptoms of a phantom virus, thereby fooling people into believing that they have been infected with a deadly new pathogen. It’s a feasible hypothesis.
Video
Here is a BGB reproduced video that goes into greater depth about graphene and graphene oxide. It traces it’s development and the unnerving uses that has been planned for it’s use.
Shocking stuff. Given all the hard scientific evidence that has been presented by real experts; the remaining ones from within the public, who are still tripping over their own feet to get injected with an experimental gene therapy (mRNA) and graphene laden concoction, that statistics clearly show is killing and maiming people. They should stop taking their tablets and visit a good psychiatrist.
BGB Correspondence Journal
We’ve been in constant correspondence with the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency [M.H.R.A] since July the 28th, about the inclusion of graphene oxide in injections . They have categorically stated in writing that the ‘vaccines’ do not contain graphene. However they have gone very quiet since they received our last letter – we possibly won’t get a further response from them. The onus is now on them to PROVE their statement – we don’t expect a response very soon. Perhaps their words will come back to bite them on their backside, their mistake has been to make such a bold statement in writing – in the wake of the Spanish researchers study and discovery.
Here is an excerpt from our Correspondence Journal showing what has been requested and what their responses have been.
Copy-Of-Correspondence-Between-BGB-and-Medicines-CJ173
So that’s the state of play to date – WATCH THIS SPACE!
We are determined to hold officialdom to account. Please feel free to make enquiries of your own – the greater the pressure the better. You have all the contact details in the above document. And don’t forget your MPs – write to them as well to demand answers, after all they are being paid handsomely to represent your concerns in parliament. If they want more information point them to BGB’s website address.
We even provide a letter template that you can use for the job. Just edit it to suit your needs.
View all of BGB’s videos by visiting the BGB archive channels at:
SUBSCRIBE for free to receive automated notifications of new posts from BGB in your e-mail inbox – as they’re published. You can unsubscribe at any time you choose.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.