MHRA Data Shows Women Who Have Lost Their Baby As a Result Of a Covid Jab Doubles In Just 7 Days

It saddens us to have to report that as a result of receiving a dose of either the Pfizer / BioNTech MRNA vaccine or the Oxford / Astrazeneca Viral Vector (still mRNA technology), a total of twenty women have now had to suffer the grief of having a miscarriage and losing their unborn child.

Adverse reactions to both jabs reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme up to the 21st February shows that the number has almost doubled in just seven days when compared with the previous weeks data, which included adverse reactions to both jabs. As of the 14th of February 2021, a total of eleven women had lost their baby with three of those being due to the Oxford vaccine and eight of those being due to the Pfizer vaccine.

The MHRA Yellow Card data now shows that the Oxford jab has caused four women to sadly lose their unborn child, an increase of one on the previous weeks data.

However the Pfizer jab has now caused, as of the 21st of February, a total of sixteen women to sadly lose their unborn child, a figure which has doubled from the eight seen in the previous week up to the 14th of February.

As of the 14th of February there had been 8.3 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine administered, with the Oxford jab lagging behind by 1.4 million at just 6.9 million doses administered. But fast forward to the 21st of February, a further 1.1 million doses of the Pfizer jab were administered, and a further 1.5 million doses of the Oxford jab.

However the number of adverse reactions to the Oxford jab is nearly double than what has been reported for the Pfizer jab, with 157,637 adverse reactions to the Oxford Jab being reported, compared with 85,179 adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab being reported as of the 21st of February 2021.

Whilst the Oxford vaccine outnumbers the Pfizer jab significantly in terms of adverse reactions, the data now clearly shows the Pfizer jab to be much more dangerous when it comes to being administered to pregnant women.

But why is this happening?

Well when the Pfizer jab was first approved for emergency use only in the United Kingdom, meaning the manufacturer is not liable for any harm or injury caused by their product, the Government’s advice was as follows –


There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy

‘For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

This was taken from a document released by the Government titled ‘REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’, of which we reported to you back in December 2020.

However the Government has since updated it’s advice within the document, for reasons unknown to the following:

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential
 outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.

How many more women need to suffer a miscarriage to stop this madness?

So now we know why pregnant women have started to be inoculated with the experimental jabs, because the Government quietly changed its own advice based on zero evidence to support it. Even going as far as to remove the recommendation that women of child bearing age being told to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.

Statistically these women stood no chance of suffering from serious illness due to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and the alleged resulting disease Covid-19, (total recovery rate = 99.97%, fatalities = 0.03% with an average age of 84 – with underlying serious health problems prior to infection, which they may have died of anyway). You work out the overall risk for yourself.

Now sadly those in the 0.03% group who are pregnant may have to suffer the misery of losing their unborn baby. Furthermore, with a big question mark over their future fertility through this injection, they may have lost the only child they could ever have.


And The Final Word Goes To “The Old Man In A Chair”

Credits: Original article published on The Daily Expose website. Checks for accuracy, minor edits and formatting changes by BGB.

SUBSCRIBE for free to receive automated notifications of new posts from BGB in your e-mail inbox – as they’re published. You can unsubscribe at any time you choose.

Please enter your details below and click 'Subscribe'

ClosePlease login

No account yet? Register


  1. Laurence Howell

    Hi G,

    More good information for pleadings. My own complaint to my Doctors has another has another 11 days to run for a response. Followed by a complaint to the GMC.

    We should now be thinking about a complaint to the WAG, putting them on notice of the latest information in respect of adverse reactions. We should be able to use the same information for both complaints.

    Emergency use…..what emergency?

  2. Big Gee

    Indeed: “What emergency?” If it wasn’t so serious, and if people were not so adversely affected and dying it would be a sick joke.

    BGB is in constant contact with the Welsh Senedd and the Westminster government and all other organisations involved in this disaster. See our ‘Correspondence Journal’.

    We are now up to 123 individual correspondences to these bodies (100 in Volume 1 and 23 in Volume 2). We do not intend giving up soon we will pester and demand answers until we get the truth.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 Big Gee's BLOG

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑